2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icip42928.2021.9506259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph-In-Graph Convolutional Networks For Brain Disease Diagnosis

Abstract: So far, in the study of neurological brain disorder diagnosis, there are mainly two kinds of work that exploits graph via Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN). Though they have achieved remarkable success, neither of them is able to simultaneously account for the brain region level correlation and subject level correlation. To tackle this issue, we design a Graph-In-Graph Convolutional Networks(GIGCN) framework, which turns out to inherit the merits of the two kinds of existing work. Specifically, we propose a g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classification experiments of ADHD and ABIDE datasets, TSP-GNN has obtained the optimal results (Figure 6), and the detailed numerical values of the classification results can be found in Supplementary Tables S2, S3. In comparison to classic machine learning approaches such as SVM (Abraham et al, 2017) and ensemble learning (Liu et al, 2020), GNN models the individual-based topologies structure (Zhou and Zhang, 2021) between subjects utilizing participant similarity, which is advantageous for enhancing classification performance. After numerous layers of graph convolution computation, highly relevant characteristics are continually aggregated .…”
Section: Comparison Results With Other Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classification experiments of ADHD and ABIDE datasets, TSP-GNN has obtained the optimal results (Figure 6), and the detailed numerical values of the classification results can be found in Supplementary Tables S2, S3. In comparison to classic machine learning approaches such as SVM (Abraham et al, 2017) and ensemble learning (Liu et al, 2020), GNN models the individual-based topologies structure (Zhou and Zhang, 2021) between subjects utilizing participant similarity, which is advantageous for enhancing classification performance. After numerous layers of graph convolution computation, highly relevant characteristics are continually aggregated .…”
Section: Comparison Results With Other Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing CNN-based methods focus more on pixel-by-pixel performance and reduce the focus on assessing the graphical similarity of vessels. Learning the graphical structures of vessels not only enhances segmentation accuracy but also yields advantages in subsequent analysis steps [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE16 Segmentation performance comparison with our approach versus state-of-the-art methods on the STARE First row is about pixel-level approaches (b-d), and second row is about graph-level approaches (e-g).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric Deep Learning (GDL) (Cao et al, 2020;Bronstein et al, 2017), a sub-branch of deep learning, has become popular in recent years to deal with more complex non-Euclidean data such as brain networks. The graph approach to GDL allows for great flexibility in modelling pairwise communications between brain regions at the subject level (Yan et al, 2019a), group-level relationships based on a population graph (Jiang et al, 2020a), or an ensemble of both (Li et al, 2022;Zhou & Zhang, 2021). However, these studies that use graph neural networks (GNNs) generally consider group-level network topology using phenotypic-based information, or use supervised subject-level embedding learning with pre-calculated population graphs for static brain network classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%