2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-44502001000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[No Title Available]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, imagination is also an embodied process (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999;Murphy, 2004;Nemirovsky & Ferrara, 2009;Steier & Kersting, in press). This may be viewed as an extension of the notion of imagining as not bounded by the brain of an individual.…”
Section: Imagining With Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, imagination is also an embodied process (Lakoff & Johnson, 1999;Murphy, 2004;Nemirovsky & Ferrara, 2009;Steier & Kersting, in press). This may be viewed as an extension of the notion of imagining as not bounded by the brain of an individual.…”
Section: Imagining With Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth considering whether our findings could be accommodated by Lakoff and Johnson's (1999) Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Lakens' (2012) polarity account. According to the Conceptual Metaphor Theory, spatial-valence metaphoric congruency effect occurs when participants make faster responses to positive words that appear at the top than those that appear at the bottom and to negative words that appear at the bottom than those that appear at the top.…”
Section: Symmetric Vs Asymmetric Rt Pattern Of the Valence × Positiomentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (e.g., Lakoff & Johnson 1999;Meier, Schnall, Schwarz, & Bargh 2012;Santiago, Roman, & Ouellet 2011), a conceptual metaphor is a linguistic expression as well as a cognitive tool that helps individuals to comprehend abstract concept (target) through congruent concrete concept (source) via a metaphoric association. People cannot enjoy the same direct experience of interacting with abstract concepts that do not have physical referents in the world as they can with concrete concepts.…”
Section: Conceptual Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La conexión entre la experiencia corporal y procesos cognitivos de otro orden como el lenguaje puede establecerse a partir de teorías como la de Barsalou (2007), donde se plantea un vínculo explícito entre la capacidad para representar mediante símbolos y el sistema intermodal de la percepción humana. Otra línea posible de indagación podría desarrollarse relacionando la teoría de los esquemas de imagen de la lingüística cognitiva (Lakoff & Johnson., 1999;Talmy, 2000) con el carácter primordial de la experiencia propioceptiva y cinestésica. Talmy (2000), por ejemplo, señala que los formas de estructuración gramatical de las lenguas tienen su origen en esquemas de dinámicas de fuerza que conciernen básicamente a los modos en que se estructura la experiencia cinestésica.…”
Section: Revista Iberoamericana De Psicologíaunclassified