No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival

Nirapathpongporn, A; Huber, D; Krieger, J. N.

doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p

Cited by 85 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As for the first point, the assertion of reproduction, the circumcision ritual in making men is an assertion of reproduction; but the conquest of fertility, which (Nirapathpongporn, Huber, and Krieger 1990). Thus, what should be conquered in a ritual of rebounding violence, fertility, is kept in check, and the male body is conquered by the state.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims: rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses

Merli

2010

Culture, Health & Sexuality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. (2010) 'Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims : rituals, biomedical practices, and local discourses.', Culture, health sexuality., 12 (7). pp. 725-738. Further information on publisher's website: The publisher of this article has made the full-text of the published version available for download at http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/ASiin3NHEIqHWPUHas92/full -a limit of 50 downloads has been set, on a rst-come, rst served basis. Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. . Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims: rituals, biomedical practices, and local discourses. Culture, Health and Sexuality 12(7): 725-738.2 Abstract This paper explores how the local Muslims in a province in southern Thailand perceive the practice of male and female genital cutting. In order to understand the importance placed on these practices, a comparison is drawn between the two and also between the male circumcision and the Buddhist ordination of monks as rites of passage. Discourses on the exposure or concealment of male and female bodies respectively, witness to the relevance of both the local political-historical context and biomedical hegemony to gendered bodies. The comparisons evince the need to reflect upon the theoretical and ethical implications of studying genital cutting and focussing exclusively on one of the two practices rather than, as this paper claims to be necessary, considering them as inextricably connected.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims: rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses

Merli

2010

Culture, Health & Sexuality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Der mikroskopische Nachweis eines Ductus deferens beweist jedoch nicht den Erfolg der Vasekomie (umgekehrt ist dies jedoch der Fall). Im Vergleich der beiden Techniken wird eine etwas geringere Komplikationsrate für die "No-scalpel-Vasektomie" angegeben, was jedoch möglicherweise mit der Erfahrung des jeweiligen Operateurs zusammenhängen kann [6]. Für beide Techniken ist eine Lokalanästhesie erforderlich, auf Wunsch des Patienten kann auch eine Kurznarkose erfolgen.…”

Section: Operative Technikenunclassified

“…In Metaanalysen und nach Auswertung großer Kollektive wird ein mittlerer Wert von 1-2% für Blutungskomplikationen ermittelt [9]. Es wird eine Abhängigkeit von der verwendeten Technik beschrieben [6], hierbei wurde bei der "No-scalpel-Vasektomie" eine niedrigere Rate an Blutungskomplikationen gesehen (0,4% vs. 3,1%). Eine wichtige Variable scheint die Erfahrung des Operateurs zu sein [9].…”

Section: Intraoperative Und Frühe Postoperative Komplikationenunclassified

Die ambulante Vasektomie

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vasectomy is the simplest and most effective method of permanent sterilization in men. In most cases, the surgical technique includes conventional vasoresection with incision of the scrotal skin or no-scalpel vasectomy as a minimally invasive method. The most important complications following surgery are haemorrhage and haematoma (1.2%), infection (3.5%), epididymitis/epididymo-orchitis (2.1%), sperm granuloma (2-70%), and chronic pain (3-8%). No long-term negative organic effects have been proven in clinical studies. The surgeon's experience and the technique applied are essential for the postoperative course, whereas performing vasectomy either on an in-patient or out-patient basis does not seem to have an influence. To evaluate the success of the vasectomy, follow-up spermiograms are obligatory. If immotile spermatozoa are present further follow-ups are necessary. Vasectomy needs to be reperformed if motile spermatozoa are detected. The chance of an unsuccessful vasectomy is below 1%. Unprotected intercourse must not be performed before two consecutive spermiograms show azoospermia.

show abstract

“…Surgically, vasectomy is performed in two separate steps: exposing some portions of the vas deferens out of the scrotum a step known as isolation, and in the next step, occluding the vas. The other method of performing vasectomy is the No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) technique, it is used in the isolation of the vas deferens in the United States, it is becoming an increasingly popular method among physicians also a choice for the developing countries (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The notable advantages includes a lower risk of hematomas, less bleeding and pain, lower risk of infections and less operating time (11)(12)(13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey on the knowledge, attitude and acceptance of male sterilzation among men in Ogbomoso, South West Nigeria

Ogunlaja¹,

Ogunlaja²,

Aworinde³

et al. 2018

Research Journal of Health Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Traditionally, majority of the family planning services and campaigns focus on women without much consideration given to their male partners. In our society, there is bias, myth and misconception about vasectomy, this has resulted in a significant reduction in the willingness of men to seek vasectomy as a means of family planning. This study aims to identify the level of awareness and acceptance of male sterilization among men in Ogbomoso, south west Nigeria. Methods:This study was a cross sectional survey carried out among men in Ogbomoso, participation was voluntary and three hundred men had the questionnaires complete and suitable for analysis.Result: This study revealed a high level of awareness of family planning methods among men in Ogbomoso. However, less than half of these men agreed that men should be involved in family planning despite a higher number of the respondents being aware of vasectomy as a means of contraception. The common reasons for not accepting of vasectomy varied from preference for other methods of contraception, cultural taboos, religious sentiments, similarity to castration , fear for surgery and surgical complications. Conclusion:Renewed effort has to be made which will be aimed at improving the level of information about vasectomy in the public domain especially by the media and health care workers. This effort should also be targeted at religious organizations, clerics and traditional institutions this is because most of these misconceptions have deep rooted religious and cultural sentiments. This can also be achieved by ensuring synergy between government, non governmental organizations,advocacy groups,traditional and religious rulers. Resume Objectif: Traditionnellement, la majorité des services et des campagnes de planification familiale sont axés sur les femmes, sans considération pour leurs partenaires masculins. Dans notre société, il y a des préjugés, des mythes et des idées fausses à propos de la vasectomie, ce qui a entraîné une réduction significative de la volonté des hommes à rechercher la vasectomie comme moyen de planification familiale. Cette étude vise à identifier le niveau de sensibilisation et d'acceptation de la stérilisation masculine chez les hommes à Ogbomoso, au sud-ouest du Nigeria. Keywords Méthodes:Cette étude était une enquête transversale réalisée chez des hommes à Ogbomoso, la participation était volontaire et trois cent hommes avaient rempli les questionnaires et pouvaient être analysés.Résultat: Cette étude a révélé un haut niveau de sensibilisation aux méthodes de planification familiale chez les hommes à Ogbomoso. Cependant, moins de la moitié de ces hommes étaient d'accord pour dire que les hommes devraient être impliqués dans la planification familiale, même si un plus grand nombre de répondants étaient conscients de la vasectomie comme moyen de contraception. Les raisons communes pour ne pas accepter la vasectomie variaient de la préférence pour d'autres méthodes de contraception, les tabous culturels, les sentiments religie...

show abstract

No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival

Cited by 85 publications

References 3 publications

Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims: rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses

Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand's Muslims: rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses

Die ambulante Vasektomie

A survey on the knowledge, attitude and acceptance of male sterilzation among men in Ogbomoso, South West Nigeria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About