2015
DOI: 10.1890/14-2158.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No release for the wicked: enemy release is dynamic and not associated with invasiveness

Abstract: The enemy release hypothesis predicts that invasive species will receive less damage from enemies, compared to co-occurring native and noninvasive exotic species in their introduced range. However, release operating early in invasion could be lost over time and with increased range size as introduced species acquire new enemies. We used three years of data, from 61 plant species planted into common gardens, to determine whether (1) invasive, noninvasive exotic, and native species experience differential damage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here exotic species did not escape herbivores (compare [31,71,72]). The concept of enemy release relies, among others, on two main criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here exotic species did not escape herbivores (compare [31,71,72]). The concept of enemy release relies, among others, on two main criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would expect that when simultaneously manipulating the diversity of native and exotic trees, the exotic species would have lower susceptibility to herbivores ([29,30], but see [31]), independent of tree diversity, while native species will show either associational resistance or associational susceptibility. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, this has never been tested with congeneric pairs of native and exotic species in a controlled experimental setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the new associations hypothesis, biotic resistance should be amplified by the lack of co‐evolutionary history between exotic plants and their new enemies (Hokkanen and Pimentel ). Most studies providing evidence for either of them, however, focused on the response of exotic species but ignored the comparison with native species (but see Dawson et al , Maron et al , Pearson et al , Schultheis et al ). Experiments comparing a large number of exotic and native species found in general no difference in their response to herbivores (Blaney and Kotanen , Agrawal and Kotanen , Maron et al , Preukschas et al ), which is in line with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tests have confirmed it only partially [25][26][27], have proved negative (e.g., [28][29][30]), or have led to conclusions contradicting it [31][32][33]. A review of the results of ERH tests [34] indicated that for alien plant species the hypothesis was confirmed in about 57% of experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%