2023
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No “July Effect” in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction: An 18‐year United States national study

Abstract: Background There has been conflicting reports on the effect of new trainees on clinical outcomes at teaching hospitals in the first training month (July in the United States of America). We sought to assess this “July effect” in a contemporary acute myocardial infarction (AMI) population. Methods Adult (>18 years) AMI hospitalizations in May and July in urban teaching and urban nonteaching hospitals in the United States were identified from the HCUP‐NIS database (2000–2017). In‐hospital mortality was compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this issue of Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions , Patolla et al report the results of an observational study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2017 comparing AMI in‐hospital mortality in the month of July versus May in teaching hospitals to assess for July effect 5 . Difference‐in‐difference analysis was performed using AMI in‐hospital mortality in the same months in nonteaching hospitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions , Patolla et al report the results of an observational study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2017 comparing AMI in‐hospital mortality in the month of July versus May in teaching hospitals to assess for July effect 5 . Difference‐in‐difference analysis was performed using AMI in‐hospital mortality in the same months in nonteaching hospitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%