2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223999.10389.c9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Increased Migration in Cups with Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing

Abstract: Therapeutic Level I. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is 10 times less wear than in the control group with conventional PE, γ-irradiated in air. Also, another of our studies involving 50 patients with highly cross-linked UHMWPE has shown almost negligible annual wear (0.009 µm) after the so-called wear-in period (Zhou et al 2006). These values correspond well with the results of laboratory studies, but they are less than was reported for of course is promising, but whether it is absolutely safe in the long term is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is 10 times less wear than in the control group with conventional PE, γ-irradiated in air. Also, another of our studies involving 50 patients with highly cross-linked UHMWPE has shown almost negligible annual wear (0.009 µm) after the so-called wear-in period (Zhou et al 2006). These values correspond well with the results of laboratory studies, but they are less than was reported for of course is promising, but whether it is absolutely safe in the long term is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In addition, we have seen similar "early creep" behavior in other RSA results with highly cross-linked PE (Zhou et al 2006), and using in vitro tests Deng et al (1998) found that creep occurs in the early time period following the application of load. Creep and true wear might in fact be different for the new highly cross-linked PEs manufactured by different methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Zhou et al [12] investigated the phenomenon of stiff implants and early loosening by randomizing patients to ceramic-ceramic or PE-ceramic bearing and followed migration of the cup in the first 2 years showing no difference between the ceramic-ceramic or PE-ceramic bearing. Although there is a lack of clinical evidence of this potential cause of loosening, stiffness of the implant may be at least theoretically a factor in preventing osseointegration and early loosening [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,25,40 More recent clinical studies have had the benefit of improved ceramic strength and quality control, and improved fixation of the acetabulum, which has resulted in dramatic improvement in intermediate and long-term results. 7,29,30,41 Further, the absence osteolysis in uncemented alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA at minimum 18.5-year followup in a study by Hamadouche et al 14 raises the possibility periprosthetic osteolysis may be greatly reduced by the use of these bearings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%