2011
DOI: 10.1890/10-2076.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence that chronic nitrogen additions increase photosynthesis in mature sugar maple forests

Abstract: Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can increase forest growth. Because N deposition commonly increases foliar N concentrations, it is thought that this increase in forest growth is a consequence of enhanced leaf-level photosynthesis. However, tests of this mechanism have been infrequent, and increases in photosynthesis have not been consistently observed in mature forests subject to chronic N deposition. In four mature northern hardwood forests in the north-central United States, chronic N additions (30 kg N … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
21
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses may have become significant if we had reduced N availability below ambient levels (Cassidy et al 2004). In a related study, this species showed increased growth from fertilization, but not photosynthetic rates, suggesting soil N might affect C allocation, rather than C assimilation (Talhelm et al 2011). This result is in contrast with previous long-term N addition studies including similar native species that reported increases in leaf N following fertilization (e.g., Magill et al, 2004;Bauer et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Responses may have become significant if we had reduced N availability below ambient levels (Cassidy et al 2004). In a related study, this species showed increased growth from fertilization, but not photosynthetic rates, suggesting soil N might affect C allocation, rather than C assimilation (Talhelm et al 2011). This result is in contrast with previous long-term N addition studies including similar native species that reported increases in leaf N following fertilization (e.g., Magill et al, 2004;Bauer et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, Talhelm et al. () did not observed differences in photosynthesis between treatments at one of our sites. Another mechanism plausibly explaining our results could be related to tree conduit architecture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, others found no relationship between NUE and soil N availability due to the inherent trade-offs between the two components of NUE, N productivity and mean residence time of N1428. Decreased NUE at the community level in response to N addition may result from lower photosynthesis under enriched N conditions29. Nitrogen addition may stimulate the growth of annual forbs at the expense of grasses as found in a similar ecosystem30, because grasses generally have higher NUE than forbs as reflected by the lower N status in grasses (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%