The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1667/rr1539.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Evidence for a Different RBE between Pulsed and Continuous 20 MeV Protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both radiobiological results are in good agreement with a complementary experiment performed at the Munich Tandem Van-de-Graaf accelerator [37,38] and a recent study of the RBE of intense single pulses of LDPR, where the dose applied to the cells was varying across the probe and analyzed retrospectively for individual irradiated areas [26]. Making use of different pulse modes of the Tandem accelerator, the first study focused on the dependence of the RBE on the peak dose rate by comparing the effect of short-pulses (few nanoseconds) and continuous beams of 20 MeV protons, while the latter directly made use of the intrinsically high peak dose rates of LDPR of up to few Gy per pulse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Both radiobiological results are in good agreement with a complementary experiment performed at the Munich Tandem Van-de-Graaf accelerator [37,38] and a recent study of the RBE of intense single pulses of LDPR, where the dose applied to the cells was varying across the probe and analyzed retrospectively for individual irradiated areas [26]. Making use of different pulse modes of the Tandem accelerator, the first study focused on the dependence of the RBE on the peak dose rate by comparing the effect of short-pulses (few nanoseconds) and continuous beams of 20 MeV protons, while the latter directly made use of the intrinsically high peak dose rates of LDPR of up to few Gy per pulse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…With respect to these endpoints no indication for a significantly altered efficiency of pulsed protons compared to a continuous irradiation was observed (8)(9)(10)(11). Further biological experiments were performed using a human skin tissue model to account for the 3D geometry and the cell interaction, again without statistically significant changes in RBE according to dose rate (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment such a simulation at high energies would be too speculative as the input parameters are not known. In the meantime, radiobiological experiments [27][28][29][30] will continue to complement these developments to evaluate the potential of laser-driven particle beams with respect to their biological effects. Overall, this concept is an interesting application of lasers in medicine which needs further investigation but may offer a unique tool for cancer therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%