2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4816610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-driven beam lines for delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy with particle beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate a compact radiotherapy unit, we assume that the beamline described earlier is mounted on a robotic arm or gantry, which is much smaller than conventional proton gantries since it does not require heavy bending magnets (instead, the laser would be deflected by mirrors, cf. [1]). Beam delivery may be accomplished e.g.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Treatment Roommentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To simulate a compact radiotherapy unit, we assume that the beamline described earlier is mounted on a robotic arm or gantry, which is much smaller than conventional proton gantries since it does not require heavy bending magnets (instead, the laser would be deflected by mirrors, cf. [1]). Beam delivery may be accomplished e.g.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Treatment Roommentioning
confidence: 93%
“…So far, proton therapy is only performed in dedicated facilities using a cyclotron or synchrotron for proton acceleration and enormous particle gantries for their application to the patient. Protons can be accelerated with lasers as well, making it theoretically possible to build compact single room systems since the protons are accelerated over a very short distance and the laser light can be deflected around the patient in a gantry requiring much less space than the magnets necessary to deflect a proton beam [1]. In contrast to conventionally accelerated protons, laser-driven protons typically exhibit a broad energy spectrum, making it possible to select the protons with the desired energy, but at the same time this requires a solution for energy selection and the stopping of protons with unwanted energy which will inevitably produce a lot of secondary particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They base this on the need for increasing proton energy, reducing the broad energy spread (spectral width) of protons, possible limits in the pulse repetition rate and the number of accelerated particles per pulse. Hofmann, Schell and Wilkins [80] do however point out that the short pulse nature of the laser processes may be ideal tools for motion adaption during radiotherapy.…”
Section: Beam Transport and Delivery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such collimator-based beamlines are highly inefficient [51] reducing the per bunch dose. The advanced treatment planning technique optimized for LAP beams proposed by Schell [20] and Hofmann [21] could be a good way to go, but the presented method of dose delivery is, however, based on the before mentioned collimator-based beamline.…”
Section: Laser-driven Versus Conventional Ibt Dose Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, new methods and techniques for beam transport, irradiation field formation and treatment planning [19][20][21], along with beam-monitoring, dosimetry and dose-controlled irradiation [22][23][24][25][26] are required. Moreover, determination of radio-biological effects induced by ultrashort intense particle bunches [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%