2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No AGN evidence in NGC 1614 from deep radio VLBI observations

Abstract: We present deep dual-band 5.0 and 8.4 GHz European VLBI Network (EVN) observations of NGC 1614, a local luminous infrared galaxy with a powerful circumnuclear starburst ring, and whose nuclear engine origin is still controversial. We aim at detecting and characterizing compact radio structures both in the nuclear region and in the circumnuclear ring. We do not find any compact source in the central 200 pc region, setting a very tight 5σ upper limit of 3.7 × 10 36 erg s −1 and 5.8 × 10 36 erg s −1 , at 5.0 and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its earlier X-ray observations with ASCA suggest the presence of an AGN based on the well fitted power-law in the 2-10 keV band (Risaliti et al 2000). Although the weak hard Xray emission indicates a Compton-thick AGN at the first place, the multi-wavelength observations in sub-millimetre (Xu et al 2015), radio (Herrero-Illana et al 2017) and X-rays (Pereira-Santaella et al 2011;Herrero-Illana et al 2014) do not support this. Xu et al (2015) found that the amount of nuclear molecular gas and dust is much lower than that predicted for CT AGNs.…”
Section: Obscured/compton-thick Agn Selection By Ir Coloursmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Its earlier X-ray observations with ASCA suggest the presence of an AGN based on the well fitted power-law in the 2-10 keV band (Risaliti et al 2000). Although the weak hard Xray emission indicates a Compton-thick AGN at the first place, the multi-wavelength observations in sub-millimetre (Xu et al 2015), radio (Herrero-Illana et al 2017) and X-rays (Pereira-Santaella et al 2011;Herrero-Illana et al 2014) do not support this. Xu et al (2015) found that the amount of nuclear molecular gas and dust is much lower than that predicted for CT AGNs.…”
Section: Obscured/compton-thick Agn Selection By Ir Coloursmentioning
confidence: 84%