2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR relaxometry a new approach to detect geochemical properties of organic matter in tight shales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that for the system of natural nanometric inorganic pores, we recorded water signals characterized by unusually high T 1 / T 2 values. 74 , 75 In the case of inclusions, it is even up to 100. In contrast, for open pores the ratio is of the order of 20.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that for the system of natural nanometric inorganic pores, we recorded water signals characterized by unusually high T 1 / T 2 values. 74 , 75 In the case of inclusions, it is even up to 100. In contrast, for open pores the ratio is of the order of 20.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR amplitude of the T 2 distribution decreased slightly or remained mostly unaltered after it was centrifugated, even the larger pores had not been expelled from the shale, indicating that the movable fluid was rare in the samples. T 2 cutoff and movable fluid distributions have been widely used to evaluate porous media properties and flowing disciplining for unconventional reservoirs [28,61,62]. In our research, fully saturated and desaturated states were used for the propose of T 2 cutoff value determination.…”
Section: Nitrogen Adsorption/desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the amorphous pore shape with a PSD spanning from a few nanometers to the micrometers range, all of these tests confront different challenges related to resolution or sample size [22,25,26]. Among them, the direct observations, such as focus ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), are strongly dependent on the field of vision, while the indirect methods, mainly based on the combination of adsorption and mercury intrusion in shale reservoirs, are limited by accuracy [12,18,21,27,28]. It is therefore imperative to combine different experimental data for the propose of determining pore morphology and PSD accurately [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan et al [ 153 ] and Saif et al [ 157 ] studied the aforementioned shale formation surface retorting, in‐situ recovery, and modular automated processing system mineralogy (MAPS). [ 158 ] However, there is no single approach that can be applied for all cases, sites, or formations. Moreover, each method has its own advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Surface Retorting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%