2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR proton chemical shift prediction of T·T mismatches in B-DNA duplexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous study in developing the chemical shift prediction method for TÁT mismatches [31], a set of 15-mer reference hairpin sequences containing a 6-base pair stem and a 3-nucleotide GAA loop was used. Owing to the loop effect, the 3 0 -flanking base of the mismatched T in the top strand was located in a more deshielded region, thus leading to systematic errors in the predicted chemical shifts of the 3 0 -flanking nucleotides.…”
Section: Justification Of the New 17-mer Reference Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous study in developing the chemical shift prediction method for TÁT mismatches [31], a set of 15-mer reference hairpin sequences containing a 6-base pair stem and a 3-nucleotide GAA loop was used. Owing to the loop effect, the 3 0 -flanking base of the mismatched T in the top strand was located in a more deshielded region, thus leading to systematic errors in the predicted chemical shifts of the 3 0 -flanking nucleotides.…”
Section: Justification Of the New 17-mer Reference Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary Information S4-S7). The prediction accuracies, expressed as the root-mean-square-deviations (RMSDs), were re-determined using the same set of experimental chemical shifts from the testing sequences [31]. As shown in Supplementary Information S8, the prediction accuracies of non-labile proton chemical shifts using the triplet chemical shifts, 5 0 and 3 0 -correction factors from the new 17-mer references (0.05, 0.06 and 0.08 ppm, respectively) was as good as those from the 15- …”
Section: Justification Of the New 17-mer Reference Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations