2016
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR permeability estimators in ‘chalk’ carbonate rocks obtained under different relaxation times and MICP size scalings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permeability can be determined from laboratory measurements, yet it is difficult to directly calculate the parameter at the subsurface (Rios et al, 2016). Many empirical methods have been proposed for the estimation of permeability based on the characteristic parameters of the T 2 distribution in downhole NMR applications, including the Schlumberger-Doll Research (SDR) method and the Timur-Coates method (Daigle & Dugan, 2009;Liu et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Timur, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permeability can be determined from laboratory measurements, yet it is difficult to directly calculate the parameter at the subsurface (Rios et al, 2016). Many empirical methods have been proposed for the estimation of permeability based on the characteristic parameters of the T 2 distribution in downhole NMR applications, including the Schlumberger-Doll Research (SDR) method and the Timur-Coates method (Daigle & Dugan, 2009;Liu et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019;Timur, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversion of T 2 relaxation times, usually in seconds, to pore size radii (R p ), usually in micrometers, was performed using Eqs. (3) and (4) as described by Rios et al (2015):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ 2 is the transverse surface relaxivity, S V is the pore surface-to-volume ratio, and F g is a geometric factor that represents planar (F g = 1), cylindrical (F g = 2) or spherical (F g = 3) pore shapes (Rios et al, 2015). In this work, pores were assumed to have a spherical shape, while ρ 2 was considered to be 35.7 µm/s, which is an average from the values calculated by Luna et al (2016), who used five samples from the same layer (Bed 2B) at Morro do Chaves Formation (Fig 1B ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specic principles, techniques, and permeability applications of T2-based NMR have been described in detail elsewhere. 25,26…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance T2 Curvementioning
confidence: 99%