2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2002.00078_4.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrous oxide does not consistently reduce isoflurane requirement in cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Imai et al. ). Studies which reported using a nonrebreathing system reported a significantly higher isoflurane MAC value compared with studies which reported using a rebreathing system (1.9% versus 1.61%, p < 0.02).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…; Imai et al. ). Studies which reported using a nonrebreathing system reported a significantly higher isoflurane MAC value compared with studies which reported using a rebreathing system (1.9% versus 1.61%, p < 0.02).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three studies did not report what type of equipment was used to measure inhalant concentrations (Imai et al. ; Lamont et al. ; Escobar et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method of measurement of MAC used in this study has been described previously (Ilkiw et al., 1997, 2002; Imai et al., 2002; Pypendop & Ilkiw, 2005b). Values for the MAC of isoflurane in the cat have ranged from 1.2 ± 0.13% to 2.21 ± 0.17% (Steffey & Howland, 1977; Ilkiw et al., 1997, 2002; March & Muir, 2003; Barter et al., 2004; Yackey et al., 2004; Lamont et al., 2005; Pypendop & Ilkiw, 2005b), so the values determined in this study are within this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%