2016
DOI: 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v10i2.3241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogênio mineral na soja integrada com a pecuária em solo arenoso

Abstract: Resumo:No Brasil, a soja tem sido introduzida em regiões que apresentam solos arenosos e clima tropical, sendo muitas vezes integrada com a pecuária. A demanda da oleaginosa por nitrogênio(N) é suprida pela mineralização da matéria orgânica do solo e pela fixação biológica do N. No entanto, há questionamentos quanto ao efeito da adubação nitrogenada na cultura da soja cultivada em solos arenosos, com alta quantidade de palha de gramíneas. Objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar o desempenho de duas cultivares d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same was observed at R4 in the experiment without N application and with 150 kg ha -1 of N. For the experiment treated with 300 kg ha -1 of N, there was effect of desiccation times on LAI and plant dry mass at R4, when earlier desiccation before sowing increased these variables. Thus, these effects on soybean growth and N accumulation disappeared with later on the crop cycle, corroborating previous results from Franchini et al (2015a), Balbinot et al (2016b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same was observed at R4 in the experiment without N application and with 150 kg ha -1 of N. For the experiment treated with 300 kg ha -1 of N, there was effect of desiccation times on LAI and plant dry mass at R4, when earlier desiccation before sowing increased these variables. Thus, these effects on soybean growth and N accumulation disappeared with later on the crop cycle, corroborating previous results from Franchini et al (2015a), Balbinot et al (2016b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the non-N-fertilized pasture, N supply to soybean may have been counterbalanced by greater biological N fixation (Balbinot et al, 2016a). In a study of Balbinot et al (2016b), no significant differences for N concentration and shoot biomass were found either in response to different rates (20 and 45 kg ha -1 of N) or N application times (sowing, R1, and R5.2) after two years of U. brizantha pasture. In a study of Franchini et al (2015b), the application of 30 kg ha -1 of N at soybean sowing did not change the canopy cover and the final plant stand either.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Soybean yield response to small N amounts should be expected only in N‐deficient soils (Dadson and Acquaah, 1984), which is not the case of soils from the Center‐South region of Paraná, southern Brazil with high SOM (SOM > 41 g kg −1 ; Table 1) (Fontoura and Bayer, 2009). Lack of yield response to starter N is consistent with previous studies in Brazil (Jendiroba and Câmara, 1994; Mendes et al, 2003; Hungria et al, 2006; Aratani et al, 2008; Balbinot Junior et al, 2016) and around the world (Herridge and Brockwell, 1988; Mrkovački et al, 2008; Josipović et al, 2011; Kamara et al, 2012; Janagard and Ebadi‐Segherloo, 2016) with diverse soil and weather conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The rationale behind this practice is to supply low amounts of N early in the season when nodules are not completely formed and N 2 fixation is not active (Abendroth et al, 2006) as well as when N derived from mineralization can be scarce under low temperatures and/or low levels of SOM (Dadson and Acquaah, 1984). Results of those studies are contradictory, showing either yield increases (e.g., Osborne and Riedell, 2006; Boroomandan et al, 2009; Gai et al, 2017) or lack of yield response to N (e.g., Hungria et al, 2006; Mrkovački et al, 2008; Josipović et al, 2011; Kamara et al, 2012; Balbinot Junior et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mulch biomass also provides physical benefits such as increased aeration and uncompacted soil (Flávio Neto et al ., 2015). Mulch biomass also provides biological benefits such as increased microbial decomposition activity and excretion of animal faeces and decreased amounts of weeds and pesticide applications, improving soybean plant establishment (Balbinot Junior et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%