1981
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300040022x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Sources for Bean Seed Production1

Abstract: Beans (Phase()las valgtais L.) often respond to N fertilization; however, N fertilization is not practiced for maximum seed production in southern Idaho. This suggests that the symbiotic relationship and/or soil N sources can provide most of the N needed by this legume. Our objective was to evaluate the relative contribution of the symbiotic-nonsymbiotic N sources by studying the effects of N fertilization on the symbiotic N. fixation and seed yields under field conditions. Experiments were conducted on silt l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
27
0
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
12
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Even control plants showed a strong nodulation (Figure 1b), which reinforces the argument that the common bean is a promiscuous host regarding native soil rhizobia (Hungria et al, 2003). The addition of mineral N strongly reduced nodulation at both soil P levels (Figure 1b) since the Phaseolus-Rhizobium symbiosis is quite sensitive to soil nitrate (Westermann et al, 1981;Leidi & Rodríguez-Navarro, 2000). However, at the highest soil P level nodulation was less affected by the mineral N applied.…”
Section: Plant Growthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Even control plants showed a strong nodulation (Figure 1b), which reinforces the argument that the common bean is a promiscuous host regarding native soil rhizobia (Hungria et al, 2003). The addition of mineral N strongly reduced nodulation at both soil P levels (Figure 1b) since the Phaseolus-Rhizobium symbiosis is quite sensitive to soil nitrate (Westermann et al, 1981;Leidi & Rodríguez-Navarro, 2000). However, at the highest soil P level nodulation was less affected by the mineral N applied.…”
Section: Plant Growthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Nitrogen fixation would have been low because of the high soil NO3 levels found in the soil. Westermann et al (1981) measured only 10 kg ha-1 fixed by this cultivar when 223 kg N ha-' was present in the soil at the start of the season. Lower levels should result in less NO 3 leaching below the root zone under normal irrigation practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A espécie é capaz de se associar simbioticamente a diversas bactérias do grupo dos rizóbios, formando nódulos nas raízes onde ocorre o processo de transformação do N 2 atmosférico em NH 3 assimilável pelas plantas, a fixação biológica de N (FBN). No feijoeiro comum, têm sido reportadas contribuições relevantes da FBN em condições de campo, como valores de N 2 fixado atingindo 90 kg ha -1 de N, correspondente a 50 % do N acumulado na maturação (Westermann et al, 1981), entre 40 e 125 kg ha -1 de N em diferentes cultivares (Rennie e Kemp, 1983), entre 21 e 44 kg ha -1 de N nos grãos de diversos genótipos (Pereira et al, 1989), e valores médios em sete diferentes países de 35 % do N derivado da atmosfera, com valores máximos de 70 % sob condições favoráveis (Hardarson et al, 1993). No entanto, a inoculação do feijoeiro com rizóbio pode não proporcionar a quantidade de N necessária para atingir altos níveis de produtividade em condições comerciais de cultivo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified