2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen removal performance and functional genes distribution patterns in solid-phase denitrification sub-surface constructed wetland with micro aeration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also exhibited the slight increase of TN concentration in T2 and T3 on the seventh day. It might be due to the shortage of carbon source required by microbes which inhibited denitrification during the continuous purification of aquaculture wastewater [31]. However, the maximum removal rates of NH 4 + -N and TN in T2 treatment were improved compared with that in T1 and T3 treatments,…”
Section: Effects Of Microbial Nanospheres On Nh 4 + -N and Tn Removalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results also exhibited the slight increase of TN concentration in T2 and T3 on the seventh day. It might be due to the shortage of carbon source required by microbes which inhibited denitrification during the continuous purification of aquaculture wastewater [31]. However, the maximum removal rates of NH 4 + -N and TN in T2 treatment were improved compared with that in T1 and T3 treatments,…”
Section: Effects Of Microbial Nanospheres On Nh 4 + -N and Tn Removalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The drawback of the biodegradable polymer-based denitrification is the relative high cost in media when compared with liquid carbon [4]. On the other hand, residual DOC (dissolved organic carbon) in effluent commonly appeared in solid-phase denitrifying reactors [3,7,8], which indicated that the entirety of the carbon source was not optimally used since part of degrading bacteria have an incapable ability in denitrification [9]. Moreover, the residual organic substances were considered to support DNRA (dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium) over denitrification [10], as well as the SRB (sulfate reduced to sulfide) process [3], especially in marine environment conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoring dissolved oxygen sufficiently can limit nitrogen release, as ammonia, from sediments but can also lead to the release of more ammoniacal and total nitrogen. The aeration technology is crucial, as, for instance, micro-nano aeration results in a higher total volume and oxygen mass transfer coefficient than blast microporous aeration (Sun et al 2018). Aeration depth is also important in relation to total nitrogen release and the type of nitrogen species released, as river sediment studies have shown .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeration technology can also be combined with other control measures; for example, technology stimulating biofilm formation (Clifford et al 2010;Ding et al 2010;Chen et al 2013) or bioremediation (Chang et al 2013;Sun et al 2018). Moreover, it was found that the unique micro-environment formed by the root systems of floating water plants can be an important factor responsible for enhanced aeration and denitrification (Sun et al 2018). The progress in microbial remediation combined with aeration technology contrasts with the lack of effort to couple this to sediment coverage methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%