1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01055429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen loss from different tillage systems and the effect on cereal grain yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, high emissions were also, in part, due to the soil surface conditions under no-till management. When no-till and conventional tillage are compared directly, losses of NH 3 -N are typically 50-400% higher when urea is broadcast at the surface of no-till (Bacon and Freney 1989;Al-Kanani and MacKenzie 1992;Palma et al 1998;Rochette et al 2008) and losses as high as 49% have also been reported (Urban et al 1987). The high volatilization that we measured from no-till fertilized with urea may be largely explained by the exceptionally high soil urease activity at the initiation of the experiment (Table 1), which was 2-10 times higher than values observed in the literature (Dick 1984;Bergstrom et al 1998Bergstrom et al , 2000Palma et al 1998;Montero et al 2004;Rochette et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, high emissions were also, in part, due to the soil surface conditions under no-till management. When no-till and conventional tillage are compared directly, losses of NH 3 -N are typically 50-400% higher when urea is broadcast at the surface of no-till (Bacon and Freney 1989;Al-Kanani and MacKenzie 1992;Palma et al 1998;Rochette et al 2008) and losses as high as 49% have also been reported (Urban et al 1987). The high volatilization that we measured from no-till fertilized with urea may be largely explained by the exceptionally high soil urease activity at the initiation of the experiment (Table 1), which was 2-10 times higher than values observed in the literature (Dick 1984;Bergstrom et al 1998Bergstrom et al , 2000Palma et al 1998;Montero et al 2004;Rochette et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouwman et al (1997) estimated an average volatilization loss of *20% of applied urea N in absence of soil incorporation. In no-till soils receiving broadcast urea, reported NH 3 -N losses varied between 5 and 50% of applied N (Keller and Mengel 1986;Urban et al 1987;Bacon and Freney 1989;Al-Kanani and MacKenzie 1992;Sainz Rozas et al 1997;Palma et al 1998;Sainz Rozas et al 1999;Zubillaga et al 2002). Volatilisation of NH 3 -N from surface broadcast applications of N fertilizers, particularly urea, is generally higher on soils under no-till than under conventional tillage (Al-Kanani and MacKenzie 1992; Palma et al 1998;Rochette et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two investigations of irrigated cotton reported on five studies that ranged from 43 to 73% of the Nr applied was denitrified (median was 50%) Humphreys et al 1990). For three studies of dryland wheat (Bacon and Freney 1989), the values ranged from 2 to 14% of the Nr applied with a median value of 11%. As expected, irrigated crops had higher rates.…”
Section: Agroecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have studied the recovery of labeled fertilizers in corn and soil at the time of harvest, and the fertilizer N not recovered has often been assumed to be lost by volatilization, denitrification or leaching (Reddy and Reddy 1993;Tran and Giroux 1998;Schindler and Knighton 1999). Only a few studies have quantified the relative importance of the various N loss mechanisms (Bacon and Freney 1989;Schneider and Haider 1992;Normand et al 1997). We used this technique in filled-in lysimeters containing two characteristic soil types of the Humid Pampas (a sandy loam and a silt loam) with a corn/ soybean rotation under zero tillage to evaluate (1) the fate of fertilizer N applied to corn and (2) the relative contribution of fertilizer and SOM to N leaching under the typical cropping conditions of the Pampas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%