1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02370264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen gas (N2+N2O) flux from urea applied to lowland rice as affected by green manure

Abstract: A field study was conducted on a clay soil (Andaqueptic Haplaquoll) in the Philippines to directly measure the evolution of (N2 + N20)-Z~N from 98 atom % ~SN-labeled urea broadcast at 29kg N ha -~ into 0.05-m-deep floodwater at 15 days after transplanting (DT) rice. The flux of (N2 + N20)-~SN during the 19 days following urea application never exceeded 28g N ha ~ day -~. The total recovery of (N 2 + N20)-~SN evolved from the field was only 0.51% of the applied N, whereas total gaseous tSN loss estimated from u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others (Letey et al 1980;Buresh and Austin 1988;John et al 1989;Samson et al 1990;Buresh and DeDatta 1990) have also reported that 15N loss determined by gaseous emissions was less than 15N loss by mass balance. This has been attributed to the effect of the soil cover in reducing the gas concentration gradient between the soil atmosphere and the head space beneath the cover.…”
Section: Comparison Of 15n Loss By Mass Balance and Gaseous Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Others (Letey et al 1980;Buresh and Austin 1988;John et al 1989;Samson et al 1990;Buresh and DeDatta 1990) have also reported that 15N loss determined by gaseous emissions was less than 15N loss by mass balance. This has been attributed to the effect of the soil cover in reducing the gas concentration gradient between the soil atmosphere and the head space beneath the cover.…”
Section: Comparison Of 15n Loss By Mass Balance and Gaseous Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These studies typically used urea because of its global importance as an N source for rice. Directly measured evolution of N 2 and N 2 O to the atmosphere represented ≤2% of the urea N applied to continuously saturated or submerged soils in a series of studies in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand (Buresh and Austin, 1988;John et al, 1989;De Datt a et al, 1991). Total N loss as determined from unaccounted for N in 15 N balances in these studies represented 10 to 56% of the applied urea N. Metal borders surrounding the plots for 15 N balances prevented N loss by runoff , and leaching was negligible on these puddled soils.…”
Section: Nitrifi Cation-denitrifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is expected since both nitrite and nitrate-N are lost by denitrification under such conditions (Prasad and Rajale, 1972;John et al, 1989). Application of wheat straw at 15 or 30t ha~1 resulted in immobilization of native soil-N, since the ammonium-N content in these treatments was lesser than control.…”
Section: Submerged Soil Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 84%