2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
72
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
11
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Freitas studied the effect of short SBR cycles on nutrient removal and found many advantages of short cycles, including increased efficiency of nutrient removal, improved SBR process performance, reduced energy consumption, and increased richness of anaerobic and aerobic microbes (Freitas et al 2009). In a study of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater in an SBR with aerobic granular sludge, shorter settlement cycles in the SBR process were found to improve waste removal (Cassidy and Belia 2005). In the present study, Phase 3 coincided with the entry into operation of the reactor and the use of short anoxic/aerobic cycles with a shorter settling time.…”
Section: Removal Of Nitrogen Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Freitas studied the effect of short SBR cycles on nutrient removal and found many advantages of short cycles, including increased efficiency of nutrient removal, improved SBR process performance, reduced energy consumption, and increased richness of anaerobic and aerobic microbes (Freitas et al 2009). In a study of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater in an SBR with aerobic granular sludge, shorter settlement cycles in the SBR process were found to improve waste removal (Cassidy and Belia 2005). In the present study, Phase 3 coincided with the entry into operation of the reactor and the use of short anoxic/aerobic cycles with a shorter settling time.…”
Section: Removal Of Nitrogen Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Many of these anaerobic systems use anaerobic granular sludge to perform treatment process (Cassidy and Belia, 2005). Anaerobic granules have a higher density than aerobic flocs, which will allow reactors to have better biomass maintenance and settling features (Van Loosdrecht et al, 1995).…”
Section: Anaerobic Treatment Process Of Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive effect of the presence of an anaerobic phase in the GSBR cycle on phosphorus removal has been reported (Cassidy and Belia 2005). The authors noted 98% effectiveness of phosphorus removal in GSBR fed with slaughterhouse wastewater with COD of 7685 mg/L, total Kjeldahl nitrogen of 1057 mg/L, total phosphorus 217 mg/L and VSS of 1520 mg/L.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The use of acetic acid for this purpose ensures high phosphate release and binding rates. The researchers in a study in which an anaerobic phase was incorporated in the operational cycle, during which external carbon, in the form of acetate, was added, reported that COD and phosphorus were removed from slaughterhouse wastewater with a 98% effi ciency (Cassidy and Belia 2005). Acetate is also a very good source of carbon for microorganisms conducting heterotrophic denitrifi cation in aerobic granular sludge (Cydzik-Kwiatkowska et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%