1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01049492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrification inhibitors in agriculture and horticulture: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
3
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitor effect of DMPP on the nitrification process resulted in higher NH 4 + accumulation during the experimental period in comparison to the AS treated soil. The highest differences in the NH 4 + concentration in the soil found from March to May were due to the fact that DMPP effectiveness decreases with increasing soil temperature (Slangen and Kerkhoff, 1984;Zerulla et al, 2001;Irigoyen et al, 2003). On the contrary, higher NO 3 -concentrations were found in AS treated soils in comparison to AS+DMPP treatments, as previously reported (Carrasco and Villar, 2001;Zerrulla et al, 2001;Muñoz-Carpena et al, 2002) in several crops.…”
Section: Seasonal Variations Of N Concentrations In Soilsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The inhibitor effect of DMPP on the nitrification process resulted in higher NH 4 + accumulation during the experimental period in comparison to the AS treated soil. The highest differences in the NH 4 + concentration in the soil found from March to May were due to the fact that DMPP effectiveness decreases with increasing soil temperature (Slangen and Kerkhoff, 1984;Zerulla et al, 2001;Irigoyen et al, 2003). On the contrary, higher NO 3 -concentrations were found in AS treated soils in comparison to AS+DMPP treatments, as previously reported (Carrasco and Villar, 2001;Zerrulla et al, 2001;Muñoz-Carpena et al, 2002) in several crops.…”
Section: Seasonal Variations Of N Concentrations In Soilsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The oxidization of NH4 + was effectively inhibited by DCD application, resulting in a nitrification rate below 2 mg kg −1 d −1 during incubation in both soils, and a relatively long Td and T0.5. Therefore, similar to the conclusion obtained by other researchers (Slangen and Kerkhoff 1984), N transformation in soil was efficiently suppressed by DCD, maintaining fertilizer N in the form of NH4 + in soil for a long time, and preventing N loss and environmental problems caused by the excessive accumulation of NO3 − -N. As we presumed, the nitrification inhibitory effect of DCD was suppressed by almost all types of biochar at any application rate in this research. Compared with DCD treatment, NA was reduced in biochar treatments, probably because the strengthened b: Latosol nitrification caused higher N loss by denitrification.…”
Section: The No3supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Such a paradigm shift in the N nutrition of field crops and pastures is necessary for developing next-generation N-efficient production systems that leak less N, thus contributing to the ecological and economic intensification of agriculture and livestock production. Many of these advantages associated with inhibiting nitrification in improving crop yield, grain quality, livestock production and environmental quality have been demonstrated using chemical nitrification inhibitors (Slangen and Kerkhoff, 1984;Prasad and Power, 1995;Subbarao et al, 2006a;Giltrap et al, 2010;Dennis et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%