Nitrification, a key process in the global nitrogen cycle that generates nitrate through microbial activity, may enhance losses of fertilizer nitrogen by leaching and denitrification. Certain plants can suppress soil-nitrification by releasing inhibitors from roots, a phenomenon termed biological nitrification inhibition (BNI). Here, we report the discovery of an effective nitrification inhibitor in the root-exudates of the tropical forage grass Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick. Named ''brachialactone,'' this inhibitor is a recently discovered cyclic diterpene with a unique 5-8-5-membered ring system and a ␥-lactone ring. It contributed 60 -90% of the inhibitory activity released from the roots of this tropical grass. Unlike nitrapyrin (a synthetic nitrification inhibitor), which affects only the ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) pathway, brachialactone appears to block both AMO and hydroxylamine oxidoreductase enzymatic pathways in Nitrosomonas. global warming ͉ nitrogen pollution ͉ nitrous oxide emissions ͉ root exudation ͉ climate change M ost modern agricultural systems are based on large inputs of inorganic nitrogen (N), with ammonium (NH 4 ϩ ) being the primary N source (1, 2). Also, current crop management practices result in the development of highly nitrifying soil environments (3, 4). Nitrification results in the transformation of the relatively immobile NH 4 ϩ to highly mobile nitrate (NO 3 Ϫ ), making inorganic N susceptible to losses through leaching of NO 3 Ϫ and/or gaseous N emissions, potentially initiating a cascade of environmental and health problems (1, 2, 5, 6). Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is one of the three major biogenic greenhouse gases contributing to global warming, produced primarily from denitrification processes in agricultural systems (5, 7). Also, assimilation of NO 3 Ϫ by plants can result in further N 2 O emissions directly from plant canopies (8). The low agronomic N-use efficiency (NUE) found in many agricultural systems is largely the result of N losses associated with nitrification (i.e., N losses from NO 3 Ϫ leaching and denitrification) (9-11). Most plants have the ability to assimilate both NH 4 ϩ and NO 3 Ϫ (12); therefore, nitrification does not need to be a dominant process in the N cycle for efficient N use.Nitrification is low in some forest and grassland soils (13-17). Since the early 1960s, some tropical grasses have been suspected of having the capacity to inhibit nitrification (18-21). However, this concept remained controversial due to the lack of direct evidence showing such inhibitory effects or the identification of specific inhibitors (22).We adopted a very sensitive bioassay using a recombinant luminescent Nitrosomonas europaea to detect biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) in plant-soil systems with the inhibitory activity of roots expressed in allylthiourea units (ATU) (23). Using this methodology, we were able to show that certain plants release nitrification inhibitors from their roots (23-26). Such BNI capacity appears to be relatively widespread among...

No abstract

Nitrification, a microbial process, is a key component and integral part of the nitrogen (N) cycle. Soil N is in a constant state of flux, moving and changing chemical forms. During nitrification, a relatively immobile N-form (NH + 4) is converted into highly mobile nitrate-N (NO − 3). The nitrate formed is susceptible to losses via leaching and conversion to gaseous forms via denitrification. Often less than 30% of the applied N fertilizer is recovered in intensive agricultural systems, largely due to losses associated with and following nitrification. Nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) is defined as the biomass produced per unit of assimilated N and is a conservative function in most biological systems. A better alternative is to define NUE as the dry matter produced per unit N applied and strive for improvements in agronomic yields through N recovery. Suppressing nitrification along with its associated N losses is potentially a key part in any strategy to improve N recovery and agronomic NUE. In many mature N-limited ecosystems, nitrification is reduced to a relatively minor flux. In such systems there is a high degree of internal N cycling with minimal loss of N. In contrast, in most highproduction agricultural systems nitrification is a major process in N cycling with the resulting N losses and inefficiencies. This review presents the current state of knowledge on nitrification and associated N losses, and discusses strategies for controlling nitrification in agricultural systems. Limitations of the currently available nitrification inhibitors are highlighted. The concept of biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) is proposed for controlling nitrification in agricultural systems utilizing traits found in natural ecosystems. It is emphasized that suppression of nitrification in agricultural systems is a critical step required for improving agronomic NUE and maintaining environmental quality.

Regulating nitrification could be a key strategy in improving nitrogen (N) recovery and agronomic N-use efficiency in situations where the loss of N following nitrification is significant. A highly sensitive bioassay using recombinant luminescent Nitrosomonas europaea, has been developed that can detect and quantify the amount of nitrification inhibitors produced by plants (hereafter referred to as BNI activity). A number of species including tropical and temperate pastures, cereals and legumes were tested for BNI in their root exudate. There was a wide range in BNI capacity among the 18 species tested; specific BNI (AT units activity g -1 root dry wt) ranged from 0 (i.e. no detectable activity) to 18.3 AT units. Among the tested cereal and legume crops, sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)], pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], and groundnut [Arachis hypogaea (L.)] showed detectable BNI in root exudate. Among pasture grasses, Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick, B. decumbens Stapf showed the highest BNI capacity. Several high-and low-BNI genotypes were identified within the B. humidicola species. Soil collected from field plots of 10 year-old high-BNI genotypes of B. humidicola, showed a near total suppression (>90%) of nitrification; most of the soil inorganic N remained in the NH 4 + form after 30 days of incubation. In contrast, soils collected from low-BNI genotypes did not show any inhibitory effect; most of the soil inorganic N was converted to NO 3 -after 30 days of incubation. In both the high-and low-BNI genotypes, BNI was detected in root exudate only when plants were grown with NH 4 + , but not when grown with NO 3 -as the sole source of N. BNI compounds when added to the soil inhibited nitrification and the relationship was linear (r 2 = 0.92 ** ; n = 12). The BNI from high-and low-BNI types when added to N. europaea in pure culture, blocked both the ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) and the hydroxylamine oxidoreductase (HAO) pathways. Our results indicated that BNI capacity varies widely among and within species; and that some degree of BNI capacity is likely a widespread phenomenon in tropical pasture grasses. We suggest that the BNI capacity could either be managed and/or introduced into pastures/crops with an expression of this phenomenon, via genetic improvement approaches that combine high productivity along with some capacity to regulate soil nitrification process.

A bioluminescence assay using recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea was adopted to detect and quantify natural nitrification inhibitors in plant-soil systems. The recombinant strain of N. europaea produces a distinct two-peak luminescence due to the expression of luxAB genes, introduced from Vibrio harveyi, during nitrification. The bioluminescence produced in this assay is highly correlated with NO 2 -production (r 2 = 0.94). Using the assay, we were able to detect significant amounts of a nitrification inhibitor produced by the roots of Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick. We propose that the inhibitory activity produced/released from plants be termed 'biological nitrification inhibition' (BNI) to distinguish it from industrially produced inhibitors. The amount of BNI activity produced by roots was expressed in units defined in terms of the action of a standard inhibitor allylthiourea (AT). The inhibitory effect from 0.22 lM AT in an assay containing 18.9 mM of NH 4 + is defined as one AT unit of activity. A substantial amount of BNI activity was released from the roots of B. humidicola (15-25 AT unit g -1 root dry wt day -1 ). The BNI activity released was a function of the growth stage and N content of the plant. Shoot N levels were positively correlated with the release of BNI activity from roots (r 2 = 0.76). The inhibitor/s released from B. humidicola roots suppressed soil nitrification. Additions of 20 units of BNI per gram of soil completely inhibited NO 3 -formation in a 55-day study and remained functionally stable in the soil for 50 days. Both the ammonia monooxygenase and the hydroxylaminooxidoreductase enzymatic pathways in Nitrosomonas were effectively blocked by the BNI activity released from B. humidicola roots. The proposed bioluminescence assay can be used to characterize and determine the BNI activity of plant roots, thus it could become a powerful tool in genetically exploiting the BNI trait in crops and pastures.

No abstract

Thi, rcblcu d~$ t~l l \ recent ~nlt~rniatii~n OII d~~iught rc\~\t~ince character~\tici of graln legumrr u~t h a vlru tnu.ird de\clop~ng appropriate gcnetlc cnhanccment \tretegle* li,r uater-i~m~tcd enrlronmcnl\ Flrat. the p<~\\ihle adaptation\ that allow grain legumes io hrtter cope w~th drought itre<< ate \urnmartzed 11 Ir \uggc*ted Ihdl there ;!re ci~nr~derahlr gain\ to he mild? In lncreailng yield iirid )~eld \t;~hil~ty In en\lronmrliti chi~Ti~cter~/.ed hy tcini~ni~l drtrught itre\\ h) further explo~l~ng drcught cxapr. hy \horten~ng crop duration Many Iralt\ conferring dehydrat~on a\otdancr and drhydrat~on tt~iernncc itre ;~~a~l;~hle. hut ~ntcg~ltcd trailr. ehprervng at a higher lebel ~r i < r r p n~/ s l~< m , are uggcrted IO hr morr u\elul in crop tmpro\enient program, Po\\~hle grnenc In~prirvcmenl \tralcplei are c~utl~ncd, rangtnp lrt~tii clnp~ticai ~eiecl~iln ior yleld in drcrughted envlronmentr to a phy\ioli,gicai genetic approach. I t I* wgge*tcd thal ~n vieu of recent ad\ances In undcr\tand~ng drought rc\i\t;incc nicchanlama. the latter \tratcgy I \ hec(~ming more Ieavhle It Ir concluded that use of'th~r rcce~itly derived Lnouledge In a \yitemallc manner can lead to \~pnificant g;ltn\ In y~cid and y~cld \rahility of llic world', tnujl~c nllrugen fixatliln. drought weening. physioiaglcal idct~type. hreedlng rtrategy.

inhibitors (BNIs). The chemical structure was analyzed which inhibited Nitrosomonas by blocking AMO and HAO enzymatic pathways. The BNIs release required the presence of NH 4 + in the root environment and the stimulatory effect of NH 4 + lasted 24 h. Unlike the hydrophobic-BNIs, the release of hydrophilic-BNIs declined at a rhizosphere pH >5.0; nearly 80 % of hydrophilic-BNI release was suppressed at pH ≥7.0. The released hydrophilic-BNIs were functionally stable within a pH range of 5.0 to 9.0. Sakuranetin showed a stronger inhibitory activity (ED 50 0.2 μM) than methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate (MHPP) (ED 50 100 μM) (isolated from hydrophilic-BNIs fraction) in the in vitro culture-bioassay, but the activity was non-functional and ineffective in the soil-assay. Conclusions There is an urgent need to identify sorghum genetic stocks with high potential to release functional-BNIs for suppressing nitrification and to improve nitrogen use efficiency in sorghum-based production systems.