2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission from Hungarian forest soils; linked with atmospheric N-deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been receiving considerable concern. However, NO is another important N loss species from forest soils (Butterbach-Bahl et al 2002;Hall and Matson 1999;Horváth et al 2006;Pilegaard et al 2006;Venterea et al 2003), and in some cases, the NO emission rate is even larger than N 2 O emission rate in N-deposited and N-fertilized forest sites (Butterbach-Bahl et al 2002;Pilegaard et al 2006;Venterea et al 2003). As summarized in Table 3, NO emission rates from European coniferous forests are highly correlated with N deposition, with the highest average annual emission rate up to 81.7 μg NO-N m −2 h −1 (Pilegaard et al 2006).…”
Section: N Loss and Retention In Forest Soilsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been receiving considerable concern. However, NO is another important N loss species from forest soils (Butterbach-Bahl et al 2002;Hall and Matson 1999;Horváth et al 2006;Pilegaard et al 2006;Venterea et al 2003), and in some cases, the NO emission rate is even larger than N 2 O emission rate in N-deposited and N-fertilized forest sites (Butterbach-Bahl et al 2002;Pilegaard et al 2006;Venterea et al 2003). As summarized in Table 3, NO emission rates from European coniferous forests are highly correlated with N deposition, with the highest average annual emission rate up to 81.7 μg NO-N m −2 h −1 (Pilegaard et al 2006).…”
Section: N Loss and Retention In Forest Soilsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, as shown in Tables 1 and 2, there is a lack of data or useful indexes (e.g., N application/deposited rates) to indicate how much N added or deposited to forest ecosystems will induce a shifted change in the amounts and rates of microbial N immobilization as well as a shifted response of other soil N processes. Background rates of atmospheric N deposition in the study site were referred to the data of Fluckiger and Braun (1998) c No background rates of atmospheric N deposition were available to calculate R The ratio of N losses as N 2 O and NO (estimated emission rates of N 2 O and NO) to N deposited and added (the rates of N deposition and fertilization application) was calculated based on the method used by Horváth et al (2006) 2.2 N mineralization…”
Section: General Characteristics Of Exogenous N-addition-induced Modimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a moist tropical forest in the Amazon during a rainfall-exclusion experiment lower annual N 2 O emissions were registered in four out of five treatment years and then recovered during the first year after the drought treatment stopped (Davidson et al 2008). In contrast, in 2003 higher annual N 2 O fluxes were observed in a grassland in the South East of Ireland (Hyde et al 2006), in forests in Austria (Kitzler et al 2006) and Hungary (Horváth et al 2006;L. Horváth, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Soil emission of NO has been determined by the dynamic chamber method as described in Horváth et al (2006). The installation of the chambers, the sampling protocol and the concentration measurement by Horiba APNA/APOA 350 instruments were described earlier in Machon et al (2010).…”
Section: Soil Nitric Oxide Flux Measurements By Dynamic Chambersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the rate of sedimentation (deposition by gravitation) is proportional to the size the ammonium has lower deposition velocity rate than nitrate, in accordance with the deposition velocities recommended by Borrell et al (1997) and Gallagher et al (2002) for nitrate and ammonium ions, respectively (Table 2). 1 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 Soil N 2 O flux was measured by weekly samplings during non-freezing periods (between 2006 and 2010) using 8 parallel static soil chambers (A=0.25 m 2 ; h=5 cm) (Christensen et al 1996;Clayton et al 1994;Horváth et al 2006). The installation of the chambers, the sampling protocol and the concentration measurement by GC-ECD were described earlier in Machon et al (2010).…”
Section: Determination Of Dry Nitrogen Deposition Based On the Inferementioning
confidence: 99%