The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0295-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide absorption by hydrogen peroxide in airlift reactor: a study using response surface methodology

Abstract: Absorption of nitric oxide from nitric oxide /air mixture in hydrogen peroxide solution has been studied on bench scale internal loop airlift reactor. The objective of this investigation was to study the performance of nitric oxide absorption in hydrogen peroxide solution in the airlift reactor and to explore/determine the optimum conditions using response surface methodology. A BoxBehnken model has been employed as an experimental design. The effect of three independent variables-namely nitric oxide gas veloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high coefficients of determination R 2 of 0.974 and 0.967, respectively, also indicated the adequate ability of the model to represent the actual relationship among the operating variables (Bashir et al, 2010; Naik and Setty, 2014; Subramonian et al, 2015). The predicted R 2 values of 0.844 and 0.809 were in desirable and reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 of 0.942 and 0.926, respectively, indicating the aptness of the experimental model within the range of operating variables (Bhanarkar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The high coefficients of determination R 2 of 0.974 and 0.967, respectively, also indicated the adequate ability of the model to represent the actual relationship among the operating variables (Bashir et al, 2010; Naik and Setty, 2014; Subramonian et al, 2015). The predicted R 2 values of 0.844 and 0.809 were in desirable and reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 of 0.942 and 0.926, respectively, indicating the aptness of the experimental model within the range of operating variables (Bhanarkar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The model had insignificant lack-of-fit values, which supported a strong model correlation between the operating conditions and COD removal. Additionally, R 2 value greater than 0.75 indicates the aptness of the model (Naik and Setty, 2014) and adjusted R 2 indicates the capability of the developed model to satisfactorily describe the system behaviour within the range of operating factors (Bhanarkar et al, 2014). In this study, the quadratic model was well-fitted to the experimental data with high R 2 and adjusted R 2 values (0.9966 and 0.9935, respectively).…”
Section: Rsm Modeling and Optimization Study On Photocatalysis Of Ppmementioning
confidence: 67%
“…As can be seen, R 2 value is high (R 2 =0.9955) and reasonably agreed with the adjusted R 2 value of 0.9872. It means that the quadratic model fits the data and satisfactorily describe the system behavior within the range of operating factors [30]. The observed and predicted values by the quadratic model are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Modeling and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%