2020
DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate removal and nitrous oxide production from upflow and downflow column woodchip bioreactors

Abstract: Woodchip denitrifying bioreactors (WDBR) reduce off-field tile drainage nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural fields. Limited evaluation exists regarding the influence of flow direction through WDBRs. Changing flow direction could reduce short circuiting. This study evaluated the dependency of nitrate-N removal and dissolved nitrous oxide (dN 2 O) production rates on vertical flow direction in triplicate column bioreactors at 12-h (without carbon dosing) and 2-h (with carbon dosing) hydraulic residence times. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory-based studies have demonstrated that dosing with acetate is effective at increasing NO 3 – removal rates during low-temperature and high-flow conditions. , Exogenous C dosing has also been implemented and evaluated in field-scale WBRs. ,, These studies employed constant dosing rates of methanol or acetate and confirmed that C dosing effectively increased the NO 3 – removal rates under real-world conditions. However, they also showed that C dosing can lead to biofouling of woodchip media and decreases in hydraulic efficiency , and the release of unmetabolized labile C in bioreactor effluent, contributing to biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in receiving waters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laboratory-based studies have demonstrated that dosing with acetate is effective at increasing NO 3 – removal rates during low-temperature and high-flow conditions. , Exogenous C dosing has also been implemented and evaluated in field-scale WBRs. ,, These studies employed constant dosing rates of methanol or acetate and confirmed that C dosing effectively increased the NO 3 – removal rates under real-world conditions. However, they also showed that C dosing can lead to biofouling of woodchip media and decreases in hydraulic efficiency , and the release of unmetabolized labile C in bioreactor effluent, contributing to biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in receiving waters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Laboratory-based studies have demonstrated that dosing with acetate is effective at increasing NO 3 − removal rates during low-temperature and high-flow conditions. 18,20 Exogenous C dosing has also been implemented and evaluated in field-scale WBRs. 19,21,22 These studies employed constant dosing rates of methanol or acetate and confirmed that C dosing effectively increased the NO 3 − removal rates under realworld conditions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although bioreactors are considered a kind of ecological engineering option effective for nitrate removal, like other nature-based solutions they can have some environmental drawbacks. Occasional high DOC leaching and the presence of potentially harmful substances in the effluents and GHG emissions are among the most detrimental aspects (Grießmeier et al, 2019;Feyereisen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Potentially Harmful Substances and Ghg Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%