2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate–nitrogen reduction by established tree and pasture buffer strips associated with a cattle feedlot effluent disposal area near Armidale, NSW Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the turf‐grass lost its efficiency over time due to vegetation cover reduction. These results are also consistent with many other researchers that previously tested buffer strips (Borin, Passoni, Thiene, & Tempesta, ; Duchemin & Hogue, ; Hay et al, ; Lee et al, ; Mankin et al, ; Patty, Real, & Gril, ; Wang, Duggin, & Nie, ). We observed that the maximum efficiency of the vetiver buffer strips occurred after about 4 months, coinciding with when the vetiver‐grass had reached its maximum growth and vegetation cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Meanwhile, the turf‐grass lost its efficiency over time due to vegetation cover reduction. These results are also consistent with many other researchers that previously tested buffer strips (Borin, Passoni, Thiene, & Tempesta, ; Duchemin & Hogue, ; Hay et al, ; Lee et al, ; Mankin et al, ; Patty, Real, & Gril, ; Wang, Duggin, & Nie, ). We observed that the maximum efficiency of the vetiver buffer strips occurred after about 4 months, coinciding with when the vetiver‐grass had reached its maximum growth and vegetation cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In de meta-analyse werden 14 studies (Magette et al 1989, Patty et al 1997, Lim et al 1998, Mendez et al 1999, Lee et al 1999, Schmitt et al 1999, Udawatta et al 2002, Blanco-Canqui et al 2004, Hay et al 2006, Mankin et al 2007, Duchemin & Hogue 2009, Wang et al 2012, Miller et al 2015, Yang et al 2015 De relatie tussen de natuurlijke logaritme (ln) van de relatieve N-hoeveelheid (N in/uit ), uitgedrukt als de verhouding tussen de N-hoeveelheid in het inspoelend water in de grasstrook ten opzichte van de N-hoeveelheid in het uitspoelend water uit de grasstrook, en de breedte van de grasstrook (uitgedrukt in meter) is: ln(N in/uit ) = 0.17 x Breedte grasstrook De grasstrook vermindert de hoeveelheid N-afspoeling en deze vermindering neemt toe naarmate de strook breder is (Figuur 2). Voor een strook met een breedte van 5 meter, zijnde de minimale breedte om een beheerovereenkomst perceelsrand aan te vragen, bedraagt de vermindering gemiddeld 57%.…”
Section: Stikstofafspoelingunclassified
“…The greater complexity induced by wood in turn supports greater habitat diversity (Collins et al , ; Johnson et al , ), and thus can potentially support greater ecological abundance and diversity. Riparian forests can also reduce delivery of diffuse pollution through trapping of fine sediment runoff from agricultural land (Cooper et al , ; Daniels and Gilliam, ; Lowrance et al , ), storing sediment behind logjams (Davidson and Eaton, ; Wohl and Scott, ), remove nitrogen and phosphorous from runoff and subsurface flow (Peterjohn and Correll, ; Lowrance et al , ; Wang et al , ; Sutton‐Grier et al , ), and enhance stream metabolism (Blaen et al , ). Forested floodplains are a source of particulate organic matter to the channel (Gurnell et al , ), provide shade (Montgomery et al , ), help regulate water temperature (Garner et al , ; Garner et al , ; Ouellet et al , ; Dugdale et al , ) increase bank stability through root reinforcement (Shields and Gray, ; Beechie et al , ) and decrease the erosive power of the channel (Gregory et al , ; Manga and Kirchner, ; Fisher et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%