Nineteenth-century urban Greek households: the case of Hermoupolis, 1861–1879

Abstract

The structure of nineteenth-century Greek households remains largely unknown. The handful of published articles and books based on quantitative analysis suggest the existence and persistence of many household forms among Greek populations. The most extensive study, and the only one dealing with an urban population, focuses on Athens. In The Making of the modern Greek family, Sant Cassia and Bada argue that an ‘urban model’ had emerged by the 1830s. Adopted from the nikokirei ‘upper-class’ group, households were characterized by equal partibility of parental property among sons and daughters, the generous endowment of daughters at marriage and ‘a tendency towards neolocality’ (the formation of an independent household on marriage). Gradually, this ‘Athenian model’ of property transmission and household organization ‘was legitimized by the church and by popular literature, and eventually became the cultural norm not merely for townspeople but for those in the countryside as well’. The authors are eager to point out that these ‘family forms and patterns of property transmission in Greece, especially in urban areas, are “new” rather than continuations of traditional rural patterns’, implying the ‘export’ of these new forms from the Athenian to other urban and rural populations.

Testing Todd and Matching Murdock: Global Data on Historical Family Characteristics

“…14 More recent research by Hionidou (1995Hionidou ( , 1999 suggests neolocality and nuclear households were the norm in the nineteenth century.…”

Sex ratios and gender discrimination in Modern Greece

“…112-23;Caftantzoglou 1997, pp. 412-3;Hionidou 1999Hionidou , p. 407, 20022016, p. 55), it is unlikely that migration can explain away our results. Due to a strict moral code designed to prevent premarital sexual relations, working outside the parental household was not considered desirable for women, especially for young single women whose chances of getting married could be jeopardized (Garnett 1914, p. 200;Stott 1973, pp.…”

Mediterranean households, British colonial statistics and Greek insular landscapes: insights from nineteenth-century Antikythera

“…A similar but much larger influx was responsible for the massive increase noted at Hermopoulos on Syros at the same time (which grew from 150 in 1821 to 13,805 people in 1828). 36 It is likely, given the economic and labour links between Syros and Antikythera at the time, that some of the arrivals to Antikythera went to Syros first. In both cases, Syros and Antikythera were most likely under the umbrella of a foreign power (French support for the Catholic community on Syros in the one case and British administration in the other) that encouraged refugees to choose these destinations.…”