2000
DOI: 10.1037/1093-4510.3.3.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nineteenth-century inhibitory theories of thinking: Bain, Ferrier, Freud (and Phineas Gage).

Abstract: The theories of thinking of Alexander Bain, David Ferrier, and Sigmund Freud are examined and their relation to Phineas Gage explored. During the 19th century Ferrier derived an inhibitory-motor theory of thinking from a similar theory of Bain's, and aspects of Freud's theory of thinking resemble both. All 3 theories were modeled on the sensory-motor reflex, and all proposed that thinking was inhibited action. Ferrier used his theory to explain the behavior of monkeys whose frontal lobes were ablated and the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…84-85, 1891; see also Jackson, 1879;Macmillan, 1997, pp. 104-105;Macmillan, 2000). By the time of Studies on Hysteria he described how he could follow a train of thought from the conscious into the unconscious:…”
Section: The Continuity Of Psychological Processesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…84-85, 1891; see also Jackson, 1879;Macmillan, 1997, pp. 104-105;Macmillan, 2000). By the time of Studies on Hysteria he described how he could follow a train of thought from the conscious into the unconscious:…”
Section: The Continuity Of Psychological Processesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This theory underpinned Sigmund Freud's ideas (1856–1939) who, at the beginning of his scientific activities (1895), had described psychological phenomena as forms of nervous energy in neuronal systems, which consisted of diverse cellular types, each with only one function [35, 4345]. During a painful experience, for example, the representation of a dangerous object would stimulate specific “neuron-keys” that could trigger aversive emotions.…”
Section: Contemporary Age: the Term Limbic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a metal rod entered his cheek and exited through the frontal region, which shattered his skull and damaged the prefrontal cortex [ 6 , 7 ]. The patient, who was in perfect physical condition, developed a behavioural disorder after the accident in which he did not have the ability to use anticipatory planning and had become socially awkward [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Based on this event, a revolution of studies and information about the process of emotions ensued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%