Nine‐ to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri‐implant lesions

Roos‐Jansåker, Ann‐Marie; Renvert, Helena; Lindahl, Christel; Renvert, Stefan

doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00908.x

Cited by 353 publications

(370 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

328

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[14][15][16][17] However, in the current study, there was minimal incidence of peri-implantitis, a chronic inflammatory condition similar to periodontitis that results in bone loss around implants. Although this study was carried out in a periodontal practice, susceptibility to aggressive periodontitis was recorded in patients receiving only 4.1 per cent of the implants, and only 3.4 per cent of the study patients were classified as heavy smokers, there were no patients who belonged to both groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

A retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutively placed implants in private practice

Nixon

Ivanovski

2009

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There have been numerous reports evaluating clinical outcomes of implants placed in institutional settings, but there are few studies relating to implants placed in private practice. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the clinical outcomes of 1000 consecutively placed Straumann implants in private specialist periodontal practice. Methods: A hand-search of patient records was undertaken to identify 1000 consecutively placed implants. Data extracted included patient demographics, details of implants placed, implant sites, timing of placement after extraction, hard and soft tissue augmentation procedures, loading protocols, type of prostheses and treatment outcomes (implant survival, implant success and complications). Results: The majority of implants (71.5 per cent) placed in patients aged 40 to 69, and the majority of patients (88.6 per cent) received 1 or 2 implants. During the period of the study, 9 implants were lost and 45 presented with complications requiring chairside intervention. A life table analysis showed 5 and 10-year cumulative survival rates of 99.2 per cent and 98.4 per cent respectively, and 5 and 10-year cumulative success rates of 93.1 per cent and 90.9 per cent respectively. Conclusions: With careful treatment planning and adherence to recommended surgical and prosthetic protocols, high implant survival and success rates can be achieved in a private practice setting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

A retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutively placed implants in private practice

Nixon

Ivanovski

2009

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[2][3][8][9] One study 6 reported a correlation between the presence of keratinized tissue, plaque levels and the incidence of mucositis, and theorized that sites with minimal keratinized tissue might be prone to a lower incidence of periodontal pocket formation. 3,10 In the anterior maxilla, however, the contribution of thick, keratinized gingiva to implant esthetics has not been disputed. As a general rule, some clinicians anticipated that 1 mm of gingival recession could be expected from the time of abutment connection M A N U S C R I P T…”

Section: Introductonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Labial Soft Tissue Recession Around Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Guided Bone Regeneration With Mineralized Allograft: A Retrospective Clinical Case Series

Borzabadi‐Farahani

Nielsen

2016

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Increased probing depths, plaque indices and bleeding on probing values have been observed in smoker sub-jects restored with dental implants. A systematic review of the literature that assessed implant loss, bone loss greater than 50%, implant mobility, persistent pain, or peri-implantitis, reported that smokers had a significantly enhanced risk of peri-implantitis (21). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of smoking and previous periodontal disease on the microbiota and peri-implant health in a group of partial edentulous patients restored with dental implants.…”

Section: Smoking and Dental Implant Failurementioning

confidence: 93%

The impact of smoking and previous periodontal disease on peri-implant microbiota and health: a retrospective study up to 7-year follow-up

Quaranta

Assenza²,

D’Isidoro

et al. 2015

ads

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryAim. To evaluate the impact of smoking and previous periodontal disease on peri-implant microbiota and health in medium to long-term maintained patients. Methods. A retrospective evaluation of partial edentulous patients restored with dental implants and enrolled in a regular supportive therapy was performed. Inclusion criteria were: medium to long-term periodontal and implant maintenance (at least 5 years), a minimum of 2 implants placed in each patient, absence of systemic diseases that may affect osseointegration. 30 implants in 15 patients were included in the study. Subjects were divided in smokers or non-smokers and between patients previously affected by periodontal disease and periodontally healthy. Peri-implant and periodontal parameters were assessed (PD,BoP, mPI). Microbiological samples were collected around implant and an adjacent tooth. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed. Results. In all the three groups no differences in bacterial counts between dental and implant sites were observed. Non smoker, healthy patients: healthy clinical parameters, significant counts of spirochetes in isolated patients. Non smokers with previous periodontal disease: occasional positive BoP values, significant high counts of pathogenic bacteria. Smokers with previous periodontal disease: clinical signs of inflammation including deep pockets and slight bone resorption, significant counts of pathogenic bacteria. Conclusions. Over a follow-up of 5 to 7 years, it is possible to state that the absence of smoking habit and previous periodontal disease positively influences the peri-implant microbiological and clinical conditions in partial edentulous patients restored with dental implants and enrolled in a strict regular supportive therapy.

show abstract

Nine‐ to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri‐implant lesions

Abstract: Individuals with a history of periodontitis and individuals who smoke are more likely to develop peri-implant lesions.

Cited by 353 publications

References 22 publications

A retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutively placed implants in private practice

A retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutively placed implants in private practice

Treatment of Labial Soft Tissue Recession Around Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Guided Bone Regeneration With Mineralized Allograft: A Retrospective Clinical Case Series

The impact of smoking and previous periodontal disease on peri-implant microbiota and health: a retrospective study up to 7-year follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About