2007
DOI: 10.4314/sajpem.v26i1.31464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nietzsche and Ubuntu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though in this article I focus sustained attention on a single account of ubuntu (Shutte, 2001), one that more or less represents the prestigious definition of ubuntu and exemplifies the problems of theorizing it, ubuntu (or its variants) has in fact been the subject of a number of attempted definitions (Samkange & Samkange, 1980;Menkiti, 1984;Broodryk, 2002;Bujo, 2001;Gyekye, 1987;Mokgoro, 1998;Masolo, 2004;Ramose, & 2003Tangwa, 1996;Verhoef & Michel, 1997;Wiredu, 1996;Enslin & Horsthemke, 2004;Cornell & van Marle, 2005;Metz, 2007Metz, & 2011Metz & Gaie, 2010;Mokgoro & Woolman, 2012;Bamford, 2007;Praeg, 2008;Letseka, 2012;Cornell, 2011Cornell, , 2012. The settled definition of choice seems to always return, again and again, to the saying "umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu" (in Nguni languages), "motho ke motho ka batho" (in Sotho languages), "a person is a person through other persons" (in English), and so on.…”
Section: Setting the Scenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though in this article I focus sustained attention on a single account of ubuntu (Shutte, 2001), one that more or less represents the prestigious definition of ubuntu and exemplifies the problems of theorizing it, ubuntu (or its variants) has in fact been the subject of a number of attempted definitions (Samkange & Samkange, 1980;Menkiti, 1984;Broodryk, 2002;Bujo, 2001;Gyekye, 1987;Mokgoro, 1998;Masolo, 2004;Ramose, & 2003Tangwa, 1996;Verhoef & Michel, 1997;Wiredu, 1996;Enslin & Horsthemke, 2004;Cornell & van Marle, 2005;Metz, 2007Metz, & 2011Metz & Gaie, 2010;Mokgoro & Woolman, 2012;Bamford, 2007;Praeg, 2008;Letseka, 2012;Cornell, 2011Cornell, , 2012. The settled definition of choice seems to always return, again and again, to the saying "umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu" (in Nguni languages), "motho ke motho ka batho" (in Sotho languages), "a person is a person through other persons" (in English), and so on.…”
Section: Setting the Scenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in a collective membership orientation, relationships, and interindividual aspects, such as group membership, acceptance, and belonging, are seen as more important parts of identity. The African concept of Ubuntu , which advocates personhood through others (Bamford, 2007), is similar to the idea of a collective membership orientation. The concept focuses on how one relates to others and involves a self-definition in which others play a crucial role.…”
Section: A Model Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ubuntu constitutes the root of African belief systems and cultures, representing both African philosophies and ways of life, in that conceptualisations of 'a good life' are based on the recognition of the interdependence of all beings (Bamford 2007;Nkondo 2007). From the 1990s, Ubuntu has been embraced as the concept that best exemplifies African cosmology.…”
Section: Ubuntumentioning
confidence: 98%