triglycerides (TGs) and decreases cardiovascular events in high-risk patients ( 1,2 ). Despite demonstrated effi cacy in cardiovascular disease, nicotinic acid is poorly tolerated and underused in clinical practice, largely due to the adverse effect of fl ushing, i.e., cutaneous vasodilation and attendant discomfort in the face, neck, trunk, and arms ( 2 ). Nicotinic acid-induced fl ushing is thought to be mediated, at least in part, by the release of prostaglandin D 2 (PGD 2 ) in the skin ( 3, 4 ), leading to vasodilation of blood vessels and consequent symptoms of redness, warmth, tingling, and itching. Studies in mice have shown that the relevant skin cell type is the epidermal Langerhans cell ( 5-7 ). Consistent with a role for PGD 2 in fl ushing, the administration of laropiprant, a high-affi nity antagonist of the PGD 2 receptor DP1, has been shown to signifi cantly inhibit nicotinic acid-induced vasodilation in mice ( 8 ) and humans ( 9 ). Although a recent study has suggested that nicotinic acid induces PGE 2 formation in isolated keratinocytes ( 10 ), inhibition of PGE 2 and its effects on fl ushing have not been demonstrated. Conversely, there is clear demonstration that nicotinic acid-induced vasodilation is suppressed in mice that have been genetically engineered to lack DP1 ( 5, 8 ).DP1 antagonism represents a strategy for improving the tolerability of nicotinic acid, and laropiprant is currently used in the clinic in combination with nicotinic acid to treat dyslipidemia ( 8 ). A necessary condition of this strategy is