2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01979-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine addiction: the possible role of functional upregulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
164
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
164
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ) and modulate neuronal excitability and synaptic communication [1-4]. The health consequences of smoking and the mechanisms involved in nicotine dependence continue to be subjects of great interest [5-9]. In addition, recent attention has been directed to the potential role of nAChRs in diseases and therapeutic targets [10-23].…”
Section: α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ) and modulate neuronal excitability and synaptic communication [1-4]. The health consequences of smoking and the mechanisms involved in nicotine dependence continue to be subjects of great interest [5-9]. In addition, recent attention has been directed to the potential role of nAChRs in diseases and therapeutic targets [10-23].…”
Section: α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupancy of these deep desensitized states by nicotine could serve as the trigger for up-regulation in receptor number (Dani and Heinemann, 1996;Fenster et al, 1999b), shown to occur in vivo for ␣4␤2 nAChRs during chronic nicotine exposure (Marks et al, 1983;Schwartz and Kellar, 1985;Flores et al, 1992;Balfour, 1994); this again could potentially involve biochemical steps, because chronic nicotine promotes enhanced ␣4 subunit phosphorylation (Hsu et al, 1997). While controversy exists over whether prolonged agonist exposure results in up-or down-regulation of receptor function (Buisson and Bertrand, 2002), recovery from this "state," whether it requires purely time (slow transition rates) or de novo receptor synthesis (Boyd, 1987;Hsu et al, 1996), likely influences synaptic transmission for prolonged periods. Girod and Role (2001) recently observed that presynaptic nAChR function could be lost for Ͼ24 h following 24 -72 h treatment with low levels of nicotine (Fig.…”
Section: Regulation Of Desensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removal of agonist the receptor can recover back to its initial resting state; however, although desensitization is potentially fully reversible, complete recovery need not occur-particularly following chronic agonist treatment (Katz and Thesleff, 1957). Incomplete recovery may reflect long-lasting accumulation of receptors in one or more desensitized states or indeed may be due to the permanent loss of functional channels (Simasko et al, 1986;Boyd, 1987;Lukas, 1991; although see Buisson and Bertrand, 2002). Desensitization is qualitatively the same across all members of the nicotinic receptor family, and as such its essential behavior can be captured in a general model (see below) onto which any quantitative differences among individual nAChRs can be mapped.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking is a chronic, relapsing disorder beginning with initiation and progressing to regular smoking. Repeated nicotine administration results in neuronal adaptations, such as upregulation of nAChRs, [50][51][52] producing dependence and tolerance such that drug abstinence is accompanied by withdrawal symptoms. 53 To avoid these effects, dependent smokers are known to regulate their nicotine intake in order to maintain levels in the blood and brain.…”
Section: Candidate Gene Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%