2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02533.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niches and neutral processes contribute to the resource-diversity relationships of stream detritivores

Abstract: 1. Explaining resource-diversity relationships is a long-standing goal in ecology, and there is currently little consensus as to the relative contributions of neutral versus a variety of proposed niche-related mechanisms. 2. The resource-diversity relationship of insect detritivores was examined in a survey of 25 small, parallel streams flowing into the Bay of Fundy in eastern Canada, with the objective of determining whether neutral processes (sampling effects) could account for the observed patterns. 3. Detr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6). This positive correlation is in contrast to most theories suggesting that higher productivities should lead to smaller ranges (Evans et al 1999, Bonn et al 2004, Sircom and Walde 2010, Whitton et al 2012). Sanders (1977) proposed that low productivity would favor specialization to consume previously underutilized carbon sources, supported by the results here (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…6). This positive correlation is in contrast to most theories suggesting that higher productivities should lead to smaller ranges (Evans et al 1999, Bonn et al 2004, Sircom and Walde 2010, Whitton et al 2012). Sanders (1977) proposed that low productivity would favor specialization to consume previously underutilized carbon sources, supported by the results here (Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…General additive model relationship is shown for the conditional relationship once body size, mean depth, mean latitude, and temperature are accounted for. Bonn et al, 2004;Sircom and Walde, 2010;Whitton et al, 2012). One possible reason for this result is that the analyses here control for a variety of other geographic, environmental, and biological factors correlated with body size.…”
Section: Consequencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, within a given environmental setting HET are predicted to possess larger biogeographic ranges as home range sizes increase to incorporate the increased food resources required (McNab, 1963;Brown and Maurer, 1987). Energetics may also impact biogeographic range size because of the connections with niche breadth (Slatyer et al, 2013): higher energy availability can lead to smaller ranges because species become resource specialists (Sircom and Walde, 2010;Whitton et al, 2012). Range size is also impacted by the degree of environmental variability in both time and space.…”
Section: Proposition 8: Metabolic Niche Width Increases With Increasimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced resources can not only increase taxa numbers and richness but may also expand niche space (Sircom and Walde 2011). Niche expansion is a second process that may explain the assemblage patterns we found on wood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%