2021
DOI: 10.1111/oik.07602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The commonness of rarity in a deep‐sea taxon

Abstract: The generality and drivers of rarity, defined along the axes of geographic range, population size and habitat specificity, have received considerable scientific attention for well over a century. Yet, studies that examine rarity holistically among these three attributes are limited, especially among invertebrate and marine taxa. The perceived paradox of deep-sea species, with often low population size but large geographic ranges, remains poorly resolved and understood. Here I assess seven forms of rarity and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly reported species (i.e., Abyssorchomene gerulicorbis, A. chevreuxi, Eurythenes maldoror, and E. magellanicus) were found in very low numbers in our samples, in at least one of the three sites. This is in accordance with previous findings in amphipods (Mohrbeck et al, 2021) and gastropods (McClain and Hardy, 2010;McClain, 2021), suggesting that local rarity is not necessarily linked to small geographic ranges. There was also overlap of species with narrow ranges in adjacent areas.…”
Section: Morphological Diversity Of Scavenging Amphipodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Commonly reported species (i.e., Abyssorchomene gerulicorbis, A. chevreuxi, Eurythenes maldoror, and E. magellanicus) were found in very low numbers in our samples, in at least one of the three sites. This is in accordance with previous findings in amphipods (Mohrbeck et al, 2021) and gastropods (McClain and Hardy, 2010;McClain, 2021), suggesting that local rarity is not necessarily linked to small geographic ranges. There was also overlap of species with narrow ranges in adjacent areas.…”
Section: Morphological Diversity Of Scavenging Amphipodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Between 310 and 411 species were found in particular strata and 132-228 in individual cores or core splits (Table 2). The combined dataset included a few relatively common (>100 specimens) morphospecies but the majority were uncommon and 29% were represented by singletons (Supplementary Figure 1), a pattern that is typical for the deep sea (Rex and Etter, 2010;McClain, 2021), including for benthic foraminifera (Douglas and Woodruff, 1981). Species were still being added after 11 samples (Figure 3), and rarefaction curves for individual cores did not reach an asymptote (Supplementary Figure 2), suggesting that the total number of species (>150 µm) was higher.…”
Section: Biodiversity and Assemblage Composition Morphological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found a strong relationship between geographic range size and occupancy in that species being found at fewer locations had a more restricted spatial spread and could be thus classified as rare (McClain, 2021 ), compared to “abundant” species containing numerous records in our data set (Figure 4 ). In addition, widespread species could tolerate a wider variation for certain parameters, notably nitrate, phytobiomass, mean temperature, and velocity (Table 3 , Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Local rarity is not necessarily linked to small geographic ranges, but could also be a sampling artifact (McClain, 2021 ). This especially holds true for the deep sea, where many regions are hugely undersampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation