2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nice or effective? Social problem solving strategies in patients with major depressive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
26
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Deficits in second-order ToM were associated with higher depressive symptoms. Other studies comparing depressed to non-depressed individuals have noted an impaired understanding of mentalistic humour stories [46], sarcasm [47], and paradoxical sarcasm [48], a lower performance on both the ‘intentionality' and ‘appropriateness' scales of the Frith-Happé animations (FHA) [48], and a significant slowdown in emotional (affective) compared to visuospatial (cognitive) ToM judgements in a 3rd-person perspective [49] in the depressed. The results of Thoma et al [47], based on the Mentalistic Interpretation Task [50], demonstrate that MDD patients are generally good at understanding the intentions and mental states underlying interpersonal actions, but they show a lower interpretation quality of others' sarcastic utterances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deficits in second-order ToM were associated with higher depressive symptoms. Other studies comparing depressed to non-depressed individuals have noted an impaired understanding of mentalistic humour stories [46], sarcasm [47], and paradoxical sarcasm [48], a lower performance on both the ‘intentionality' and ‘appropriateness' scales of the Frith-Happé animations (FHA) [48], and a significant slowdown in emotional (affective) compared to visuospatial (cognitive) ToM judgements in a 3rd-person perspective [49] in the depressed. The results of Thoma et al [47], based on the Mentalistic Interpretation Task [50], demonstrate that MDD patients are generally good at understanding the intentions and mental states underlying interpersonal actions, but they show a lower interpretation quality of others' sarcastic utterances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies comparing depressed to non-depressed individuals have noted an impaired understanding of mentalistic humour stories [46], sarcasm [47], and paradoxical sarcasm [48], a lower performance on both the ‘intentionality' and ‘appropriateness' scales of the Frith-Happé animations (FHA) [48], and a significant slowdown in emotional (affective) compared to visuospatial (cognitive) ToM judgements in a 3rd-person perspective [49] in the depressed. The results of Thoma et al [47], based on the Mentalistic Interpretation Task [50], demonstrate that MDD patients are generally good at understanding the intentions and mental states underlying interpersonal actions, but they show a lower interpretation quality of others' sarcastic utterances. Ladegaard et al [48] did not find any significant differences between first-episode depressed patients and controls on the sincere and sarcastic variables from the Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) [51], suggesting that patients are able to correctly judge the intent of a speaker and synthesize information transmitted by body language and prosody when the discrepancy between statement and intention is simple.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in various fractions empathy have been observed in several psychiatric conditions including autism 1 , bipolar disorder 3 , schizophrenia 4-6 , and major depressive disorder 3, 7,8 . Two major fractions of empathy include affective empathy (the drive to respond to another's mental state with an appropriate emotion) and cognitive empathy (the ability to recognize another's mental state).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that executive function and information processing have been shown to been detrimentally effected in MDD patients (Fossati et al, 2002 ; Tsourtos et al, 2002 ; Baune et al, 2010 ; Snyder, 2013 ), it is a reasonable to assume that these would also have an impact social cognition also. While emotional information processing research has been gaining traction in the past decade (Suslow et al, 2004 ; Gilboa-Schechtman et al, 2005 ; Karparova et al, 2005 ), the relationship between executive function and social cognition requires further research (Uekermann et al, 2008 ; Ladegaard et al, 2014 ; Thoma et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%