2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ni-samaria-doped ceria (Ni-SDC) anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) operating with CO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure of the cell after 6 operating hours is not very detrimental but is certainly related to the observed accumulation of carbon deposits on the anode/electrolyte interface throughout the cell testing period. This is also revealed by Ideris et al when testing the operation of SOFC based on similar Ni‐SDC anode with CO showing that 7–8 wt.% carbon formation at the anode/electrolyte interface allowed the cell to continue operation without catastrophic failure. Nevertheless, SOFC fed by OMWS crude bio‐oil operation persisted for about 3 h under open circuit conditions at 750 °C (starting from Point G of Figure ) despite the favor of the charring residues accumulation through the porous anodic under these conditions which may be due to the presence of SDC in the anode promoting in the carbon removal instead of conventional YSZ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure of the cell after 6 operating hours is not very detrimental but is certainly related to the observed accumulation of carbon deposits on the anode/electrolyte interface throughout the cell testing period. This is also revealed by Ideris et al when testing the operation of SOFC based on similar Ni‐SDC anode with CO showing that 7–8 wt.% carbon formation at the anode/electrolyte interface allowed the cell to continue operation without catastrophic failure. Nevertheless, SOFC fed by OMWS crude bio‐oil operation persisted for about 3 h under open circuit conditions at 750 °C (starting from Point G of Figure ) despite the favor of the charring residues accumulation through the porous anodic under these conditions which may be due to the presence of SDC in the anode promoting in the carbon removal instead of conventional YSZ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If volume of particles of anode is greater than 1-f c (f c is volume fraction of electrolyte) or smaller than ϕ, the polarization resistance would not depend on thickness of composite. 126 Different fuels used Ni-SDC 500°C 98 Formation of coke 99 Ni-GDC 500°C 100 (1) Formation of coke (2) Degradation in electronic performance 59 Ni-LSGM 550°C Has maximum power density 101 Ni-BZCY7 500°C 102 Smaller OCV value 103 Ni/YSZ cermets <800°C 104 (1) Deposition of carbon (2) Weak electrical performance 6 Ni-GDC 600°C 77 interfere with the performance of SOFC and hence have different effects on electrode polarization resistance, some of the materials are given below in Table 6 with the temperature used to evaluate the electrode polarization.…”
Section: Solid Oxide Fc Anodes Based On Electrode Polarization Resimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] Moreover, experimental investigation of the role of deposits issued from higher molecular weights hydrocarbons when directly oxidized in fuels cells showed that if the quantity is limited to~1 wt % of the anode, the enhancement of the cell performance was expected implying that the deposits improve the connectivity of the metallic phase in the anode. Results seems promising as the lowest carbon weight ratio depicted from EDX analysis of an SOFC using same Ni-SDC anode material was 6.9 % within the porous layer while a higher carbon weight ratio (33.6 %) was recorded at the anode surface (fuel inlet) when powering the cell with 40 % CO gas.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Sofc Anode Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors claimed that the SDC in the Ni-SDC anode cermet have promoted carbon removal within the anode and reduce consequently the risk of cell failure due to coking. [31] Moreover, experimental investigation of the role of deposits issued from higher molecular weights hydrocarbons when directly oxidized in fuels cells showed that if the quantity is limited to~1 wt % of the anode, the enhancement of the cell performance was expected implying that the deposits improve the connectivity of the metallic phase in the anode. [35] This is consistent with the structure of the anode materials prepared in this study by a simple printing technique which is likely to be a much less random than cermet prepared through more conventional methods.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Sofc Anode Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%