2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach applied to species identification in mixed processed seafood products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the DNA based technologies have proven to be very effective as food fraud detection tools [ 13 , 14 ] and the methodology of DNA barcoding based on the cytochrome oxidase I sequences is the most used one [ 12 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 79 ]. In the last decade new techniques such as Real Time-PCR, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), Forensically Informative Nucleotide Sequencing (FINS), Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), High Resolution Melting Analysis (HRMA), Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) metabarcoding, have been proposed by researchers with the aim of optimizing time, costs and effectiveness of species authentication in multi-species fish products [ 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. Although these techniques have been also combined with COI barcoding by providing promising approaches for high throughput species discrimination in processed seafood [ 84 , 85 , 86 ], traditional mitochondrial DNA-based methods and the PCR-RFLP in particular is still employed due to the advantages offered such as relatively cheapness, lack of technical over-complication, suitability for routine analyses [ 85 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the DNA based technologies have proven to be very effective as food fraud detection tools [ 13 , 14 ] and the methodology of DNA barcoding based on the cytochrome oxidase I sequences is the most used one [ 12 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 79 ]. In the last decade new techniques such as Real Time-PCR, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), Forensically Informative Nucleotide Sequencing (FINS), Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), High Resolution Melting Analysis (HRMA), Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) metabarcoding, have been proposed by researchers with the aim of optimizing time, costs and effectiveness of species authentication in multi-species fish products [ 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. Although these techniques have been also combined with COI barcoding by providing promising approaches for high throughput species discrimination in processed seafood [ 84 , 85 , 86 ], traditional mitochondrial DNA-based methods and the PCR-RFLP in particular is still employed due to the advantages offered such as relatively cheapness, lack of technical over-complication, suitability for routine analyses [ 85 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction and purification of genomic DNA were performed starting from aliquots of 25 mg of each sample, using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), as reported by Piredda et al (2022). In order to verify the purity of the extraction reagents, negative extraction control (no added tissue) (ENC) was included.…”
Section: Dna Extraction Purification and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, molecular identifications of each sample were compared with the species declared in the ingredient list. Mislabelling was established if: a) labels did not report all mandatory information reported above; b) the scientific name and/or the commercial designation did not correspond to that detected by the molecular analysis (Piredda et al, 2022;Giusti et al, 2017). Furthermore, molecular identifications were cross-checked against the Annex I, Italian MiPAAF Decree dated 22 September 2017 in order to detect the presence of taxa unmarketable in Italy.…”
Section: Analysis Of Labels and Mislabelling Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations