News After Trump: Journalism’s Crisis of Relevance in a Changed Media CultureMatt Carlson, Sue Robinson, and Seth Lewis.
            <b>
              <i>News After Trump: Journalism’s Crisis of Relevance in a Changed Media Culture</i>
            </b>
            . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2022, 280 pp., ISBN No. 9780197550342 (paperback).

Perreault, Gregory

doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2154113

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…National political reporters' overage of President Trump during his time in office is another example. Despite expressing an intention to publish the truth, these reporters and their news organizations continually opened their news pages and television shows to President Trump's lies (e.g., Carlson et al, 2021).…”

Section: Redundancy Misalignment and Changementioning

confidence: 99%

How journalists internalize news practices and why it matters

Ryfe

2022

Journalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Practice scholars of news production generally imagine news practices as symbolic resources that exist external to reporters, and prior to reporters’ actions. This understanding has been incredibly productive for scholars, but it elides an important question. How do news practices actually get into reporters’ heads? The lack of answers to this question has created a persistent gap between the study of news practices and examination of reporters’ actions. In this essay, I build on recent advances in cognitive cultural sociology, especially the dual process theory of social cognition, to offer an account of how reporters internalize culture. I argue that this account is especially helpful for analysis of situations in which what journalists can say about what they do is only loosely associated with what they do, or know how to do. In my estimation, such situations are increasingly common in journalism. A clearer understanding of processes of internalization will lead to more accurate assessments of reporters’ actions, especially in situations in which their words and their deeds are not aligned.

show abstract

Section: Redundancy Misalignment and Changementioning

confidence: 99%

How journalists internalize news practices and why it matters

Ryfe

2022

Journalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The hybridisation (Chadwick, 2013), porosity (Carlson & Lewis, 2015), and technological saturation (Harambam et al., 2018) of the contemporary media environment are arguably the greatest challenges ever for news media and news media trust because “like never before, news media today face competition for people's attention from a myriad of other sources of information” (Strömbäck et al., 2020, p. 140). Some of those sources, especially those that embrace a populist stance, 1 try also to systematically delegitimize journalism (see Carlson, Lewis, & Robinson, 2021). Indeed, public attacks on the news media have become a dominant feature of the current wave of populist politicians, parties, and movements (e.g., Egelhofer & Lecheler, 2019; Panievsky, 2021; Van Dalen, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing a qualitative turn in news media trust research

Garusi

Splendore

2023

Sociology Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contemporary media environment represents the greatest challenge ever to journalism's legitimacy. Surveys conducted in different parts of the world highlight a decline in trust in news media. Due to the numerous changes in the news media environment, different investigative tools are required to grasp the mechanisms underlying news media trust from those adopted so far. This article provides a review of existing media trust research and argues that it is necessary to investigate news media trust (also) from a qualitative perspective because today understanding media trust is as crucial as measuring it.

show abstract

“…This study undertakes to understand how political journalists conceptualize the role of the editorial endorsements in the context of, and in response to, the 2016 U.S. presidential election as a critical incident within the field (Boczkowski & Papacharissi, 2018;Carlson et al, 2021;Gutsche, 2018;Lewis et al, 2021;Scacco & Coe, 2021). This was done through 64 long-form interviews with U.S.-based political journalists.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists Distance Themselves From the Editorial Endorsement Process

Perreault

Kananovich

Hackett

2022

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Through a lens of boundary work and role conception, this study seeks to understand how political journalists discursively construct the role of the newspaper editorial endorsement. Researchers conducted long-form interviews with political journalists in the United States ( n = 64) to understand how journalists conducted boundary work relative to endorsements. Journalists argued that the 2016 election was a decisive event in which political news endorsements lost their original objective. Political journalists described laboring to discursively distance themselves from the endorsement process and viewed political endorsements not only as ineffective, but also as jeopardizing their news organizations’ independence.

show abstract

News After Trump: Journalism’s Crisis of Relevance in a Changed Media CultureMatt Carlson, Sue Robinson, and Seth Lewis. News After Trump: Journalism’s Crisis of Relevance in a Changed Media Culture . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2022, 280 pp., ISBN No. 9780197550342 (paperback).

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

How journalists internalize news practices and why it matters

How journalists internalize news practices and why it matters

Advancing a qualitative turn in news media trust research

Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists Distance Themselves From the Editorial Endorsement Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About