Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists Distance Themselves From the Editorial Endorsement Process

Abstract

Through a lens of boundary work and role conception, this study seeks to understand how political journalists discursively construct the role of the newspaper editorial endorsement. Researchers conducted long-form interviews with political journalists in the United States ( n = 64) to understand how journalists conducted boundary work relative to endorsements. Journalists argued that the 2016 election was a decisive event in which political news endorsements lost their original objective. Political journalists described laboring to discursively distance themselves from the endorsement process and viewed political endorsements not only as ineffective, but also as jeopardizing their news organizations’ independence.

“Part of the Team”: In-House Sports Reporters Navigating the Journalistic Periphery

“…Their position within the field mirrors perceptions of professionalism and intimacy with the audience. Journalism-particularly political journalism (Perreault et al 2023)-occupies a central hub within the field, embodying strong views of professional orthodoxy. However, this orthodoxy, which grants access to the field's resources, demands a more comprehensive understanding of peripheral actors-the heterodox players-which is precisely what this study aims to do.…”

Effective leadership in journalism: Field theory in how journalists evaluate newsroom leadership

“…The location of actors within the field reflects their perceived professionalism and intimacy with the audience (Perreault, & Hanusch, 2022). Certain actors, such as political journalists (Perreault, Kananovich & Hackett, 2023), and investigative journalists, often hold a more privileged position than others within the field. Similarly, leaders would seem to also be in a privileged position given that they can determine the location of their subordinates to some degree (e.g.…”