2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newly identified axon types of the facial nerve unveil supplemental neural pathways in the innervation of the face

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sympathetic nerve fibers were identified by anti-TH antibodies. Despite the fact that anti-TH specificity has been shown to extend beyond sympathetic nature of the neuronal entities (Brumovsky, 2016;Vyas et al, 2017;Tang and Pierchala, 2022), authors confirmed the neural origin of the sympathetic nerve fibers of the facial nerve in the superior cervical ganglion in a previous study (Tereshenko et al, 2023a). The myelinated fibers were specifically visualized by anti-MBP.…”
Section: Immunofluorescence Labelingmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sympathetic nerve fibers were identified by anti-TH antibodies. Despite the fact that anti-TH specificity has been shown to extend beyond sympathetic nature of the neuronal entities (Brumovsky, 2016;Vyas et al, 2017;Tang and Pierchala, 2022), authors confirmed the neural origin of the sympathetic nerve fibers of the facial nerve in the superior cervical ganglion in a previous study (Tereshenko et al, 2023a). The myelinated fibers were specifically visualized by anti-MBP.…”
Section: Immunofluorescence Labelingmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, it has been historically accepted that control of the facial muscles is provided solely by motor neuronal input of the facial nerve and controversies regarding the nature of neural feedback from the facial muscles have emerged over the past years (Carmichael and Woollard, 1933;Cobo et al, 2017). The view of a purely motor facial nerve has been questioned in a recent experimental study (Tereshenko et al, 2023a) but the extent of non-motor axons in facial muscle control remains unclear yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, smooth muscles (targeted by the parasympathetic system) and skeletal muscles (targeted by the somatic efferent system) differ in their ultrastructural morphology, physiology, and embryogenesis (Waite and Li, 1993;Somlyo and Somlyo, 1994;Eddinger, 1998). A previous study reported on the sympathetic axons in the extracranial facial nerve, which highlighted their possible contribution to the maintenance and modulation of neuromuscular junctions (Takeuchi et al, 1993;Tereshenko et al, 2022). One of the intriguing questions is whether the neural input is essential for differentiated properties of the muscle tissue and if it can determine not only the different transcriptome activations but remodel morphologic and physiologic properties of muscle tissue as well (de Medinaceli and Rawlings, 1987;Weng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized stratification of nerves into sensory or motor types does not accurately reflect the true axonal architecture of a particular nerve, as neither motor nor sensory nerves contain exclusively efferent or afferent nerve fibers. 2,3 Even those motor branches that innervate the neuromuscular junctions within the muscle must contain Ia afferent proprioceptive nerve fibers, given that motor control of almost all skeletal muscles relies on proprioceptive feedback. 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the origin of the Tinel sign along these grafts has remained unclear because of the traditional view of the extracranial facial nerve as a pure motor nerve. 3 Recent findings have highlighted an afferent axonal population of facial nerve branches that originates from trigeminal nerve fibers. 3 Thus, a positive Tinel sign only resonates axonal regeneration of the sensory axons traveling through the cross-face nerve graft from the trigeminal nerve fibers that do not contribute to motor restoration of facial expressions (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%