2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New ultra-high temperature nanoindentation system for operating at up to 1100 °C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the development of non-ambient temperature nanoindentation systems has made significant progress. This opens the possibility for studying the BDT in a rather wide temperature range between − 142 and 1100 °C [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the development of non-ambient temperature nanoindentation systems has made significant progress. This opens the possibility for studying the BDT in a rather wide temperature range between − 142 and 1100 °C [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, substantial advances in the nanoindentation (also known as instrumented or depth-sensing indentation) systems and new test protocols have opened new directions to study the small-scale mechanical properties [63][64][65]. For example, fast time constant (10's of µs) and high data acquisition rates (close to MHz) [66] allow to capture various events (e.g., slip transmission across the GB [67][68][69][70], phase transformation [71,72], cracking [73][74][75][76], etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the modulus is directly proportional to the contact stiffness [33], any uncertainty in load frame stiffness directly impacts the modulus determination. Hence, caution needs to be exercised in applying the often-used constant modulus assumption [34], wherein the contact stiffness and a known value of modulus are used to eliminate the need to know the displacement or area function to determine hardness. Any error in stiffness due to plasticity will lead to errors in hardness determination in such cases, and hence it is preferable to use the new method wherein the plasticity error is minimized and constant with depth.…”
Section: Experimental Assessment Of the New Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%