2021
DOI: 10.1557/s43578-021-00131-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by load and depth sensing indentation: Improvements to the technique based on continuous stiffness measurement

Abstract: The method to measure hardness and elastic modulus of small volumes of material by instrumented indentation was developed in the early works of Oliver and Pharr (1992, 2004). This helped to establish the field of small scale nanomechanical testing. Since then, several advances in measurement electronics have enabled testing over a wider range of test conditions (speeds) using methodologies that were developed earlier. Here, we present an updated overview of the various factors that affect the precision and acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibrations of spherical tips can be assessed with a variety of key benchmarks. The most common benchmark in nanoindentation is observation of a constant Young's modulus with depth [e.g., 28,49]. Following the derivation from Hackett et al [16] and using Equations 4 and 9, we can express the effective Young's modulus as…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibrations of spherical tips can be assessed with a variety of key benchmarks. The most common benchmark in nanoindentation is observation of a constant Young's modulus with depth [e.g., 28,49]. Following the derivation from Hackett et al [16] and using Equations 4 and 9, we can express the effective Young's modulus as…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most indentation instruments are preset calculation equations of hardness [49,50]. The penetration depth h is calculated through an initial point that the indenter begins to contact the tested surface of the specimen.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, it became the first and, to date, the only nanomechanical testing method sanctioned with an ISO norm (ISO:14,577 [7]). Still, a non-negligible number of the contributions to this focus issue are devoted to further improving its reliability [8][9][10][11][12][13], based on emerging technologies. These include more accurate imaging [8,10,11] and faster data processing [9], which, for example, allow for improved characterization of the geometry of the indenter tip and the resulting contact area.…”
Section: Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a non-negligible number of the contributions to this focus issue are devoted to further improving its reliability [8][9][10][11][12][13], based on emerging technologies. These include more accurate imaging [8,10,11] and faster data processing [9], which, for example, allow for improved characterization of the geometry of the indenter tip and the resulting contact area. In addition, this focus issue documents new method developments, which aim at further expanding the capabilities of nanoindentation beyond the measurement of hardness and Young's modulus, e.g., accessing the local creep properties [14], ductility [15], and surface free energy [16] of materials.…”
Section: Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 99%