2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New supervised alignment method as a preprocessing tool for chromatographic data in metabolomic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, retention times of the fragments between the aforementioned peaks are linearly interpolated. A full description of this method has been explained in detail in the work of Struck et al ( 2012 ). The chromatograms before and after SA are presented in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, retention times of the fragments between the aforementioned peaks are linearly interpolated. A full description of this method has been explained in detail in the work of Struck et al ( 2012 ). The chromatograms before and after SA are presented in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likely an aromatic molecular ion for C 14 -alkylbenzene (normally observed in heavy distillates or vinyl pyrolysis) Overall, with the exception of Sample 90, all of the false positives detected could still be reasonably identified as positive, in that these samples all contained some evidence of a petroleum product, just not a product that could be confidently identified as gasoline.…”
Section: False Positive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The size of the data files may be a technical hurdle for some computers; however, the need to account for sample‐to‐sample shifts in retention times coupled with the highly unpredictable and inconsistent chromatographic patterns present in the data presents a significant fundamental challenge. Due to a lack of consistent intrinsic retention time markers, algorithms that require landmarks or anchors struggle with fire debris chromatograms. Algorithms such as correlation optimized warping (COW) , interval correlated shifting (Icoshift) , and recursive alignment by fast Fourier transform (RAFFT) are similarly defeated by the inherent lack of correlation between fire debris chromatograms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chromatographic analyses often face problems connected with incomplete analyte separation, presence of interfering substances and matrix effects, the preliminary action in data interpretation is often based on pretreatment of raw data or its binning and alignment to obtain reliable models in further analyses. Different chemometric strategies such as correlation optimized warping [Nielsen et al., ], Gaussian binning [Anderson et al., ], or supervised alignment [Struck et al., ] serve such purposes and improve the quality of so‐called second‐order chromatographic signals as a result.…”
Section: An Overview Of Chemometric Methods Most Commonly Used In CLImentioning
confidence: 99%