2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-7466.2010.01074.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Spheres of Transnational Formations: Mobilizations of Humanitarian Diasporas

Abstract: The subject of this article is the reinscription of a new diaspora in the public sphere by which governments and multilateral institutions are mobilizing. The following argues that these kinds of mobilizations have had the effect of subverting traditional approaches to diasporic linkage that in African and African American studies have privileged trans‐Atlantic slavery and its consequent social dislocations and led to the marginalization of other forced and voluntary diasporic linkages. As this article argues,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New media are now a central feature of the contemporary lives of migrants who use cell phones, chat rooms, blogs, Facebook, Skype, YouTube, and, most recently, Twitter to create and sustain complex transnational networks (Parham 2004, Bernal 2005a, Ignacio 2005, Panagakos and Horst 2006, Gajjala 2008). There is a growing recognition of the significance of diasporas (Werbner 2002, Braziel and Manur 2003, Zeleza 2009, Clarke 2010, Knott and McLoughlin 2010. Transnational relationships between sending states and diasporas, moreover, are now an established political reality even as their form and content shift and evolve (Bernal 2004, Kleist 2008, Lyons and Mandaville 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…New media are now a central feature of the contemporary lives of migrants who use cell phones, chat rooms, blogs, Facebook, Skype, YouTube, and, most recently, Twitter to create and sustain complex transnational networks (Parham 2004, Bernal 2005a, Ignacio 2005, Panagakos and Horst 2006, Gajjala 2008). There is a growing recognition of the significance of diasporas (Werbner 2002, Braziel and Manur 2003, Zeleza 2009, Clarke 2010, Knott and McLoughlin 2010. Transnational relationships between sending states and diasporas, moreover, are now an established political reality even as their form and content shift and evolve (Bernal 2004, Kleist 2008, Lyons and Mandaville 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In terms of performance, Fadalla (2008), in studying the relief activities in Sudan, speaks of a neoliberal agenda undertaken deliberately, and Clarke (2010), in discussing various actions in Africa, reports the existence of a "humanitarian diaspora" subservient to the interests of similarly neoliberal governments. Brauman (2004) makes use of the term "aid industry" and is skeptical of the defense that the agencies are better prepared than governments to respond to emergencies.…”
Section: Aid Agencies: Valued and Criticizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where Africana studies in the us have been primarily focused on the geographies of blackness that emerged through the trans-Atlantic slave trade, accounting for questions of space, place and mobility that go beyond slavery can allow a better understanding of the new ways in which black people are reconfiguring and reframing diaspora (cf. Clarke 2010).…”
Section: Spatializing Ontologies Of Blacknessmentioning
confidence: 99%