2001
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0216:nsobab]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Species ofBufo(Anura: Bufonidae) from Central Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, molecular evidence indicates an even closer relationship between the R. acrolopha group and certain species of the R. veraguensis group, specifically R. chavin, R. manu, R. nesiotes, and R. yanachaga (Pramuk, 2006;Chaparro et al, 2007;Pramuk et al, 2008;Van Bocxlaer et al, 2010;Pyron and Wiens, 2011;Peloso et al, 2012;Moravec et al, 2014). Furthermore, the results of those analyses of DNA sequences are consistent with the distribution of several putative morphological synapomorphies, including: (1) occurrence of few, large, unpigmented eggs in the R. acrolopha group and R. chavin, R. justinianoi, R. manu, R. multiverrucosa, R. nesiotes, and R. yanachaga of the R. veraguensis group (Duellman and Toft, 1979;Lehr et al, 2001Lehr et al, , 2005Lehr et al, , 2007Chaparro et al, 2007); (2) m. levator mandibulae externus undivided with trigeminal nerve passing medial (deep) to the muscle in R. paraguas (reported herein) and all other species of the R. acrolopha group (TG, personal observation) and at least R. manu (Chaparro et al, 2007) and R. quechua (TG, personal observation) of the R. veraguensis group; and (3) absence of the m. adductor longus in the R. acrolopha group (Trueb, 1971; TG, personal observation) and R. manu (Chaparro et al, 2007). In contrast, species of the R. margaritifera group possess many small, pigmented eggs, a divided m. levator mandibulae externus with V 3 passing between the two slips, and usually (for an exception, see Vélez-Rodríguez and Ruiz-Carranza, 2002) the m. adductor longus (Trueb, 1971;Frost et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, molecular evidence indicates an even closer relationship between the R. acrolopha group and certain species of the R. veraguensis group, specifically R. chavin, R. manu, R. nesiotes, and R. yanachaga (Pramuk, 2006;Chaparro et al, 2007;Pramuk et al, 2008;Van Bocxlaer et al, 2010;Pyron and Wiens, 2011;Peloso et al, 2012;Moravec et al, 2014). Furthermore, the results of those analyses of DNA sequences are consistent with the distribution of several putative morphological synapomorphies, including: (1) occurrence of few, large, unpigmented eggs in the R. acrolopha group and R. chavin, R. justinianoi, R. manu, R. multiverrucosa, R. nesiotes, and R. yanachaga of the R. veraguensis group (Duellman and Toft, 1979;Lehr et al, 2001Lehr et al, , 2005Lehr et al, , 2007Chaparro et al, 2007); (2) m. levator mandibulae externus undivided with trigeminal nerve passing medial (deep) to the muscle in R. paraguas (reported herein) and all other species of the R. acrolopha group (TG, personal observation) and at least R. manu (Chaparro et al, 2007) and R. quechua (TG, personal observation) of the R. veraguensis group; and (3) absence of the m. adductor longus in the R. acrolopha group (Trueb, 1971; TG, personal observation) and R. manu (Chaparro et al, 2007). In contrast, species of the R. margaritifera group possess many small, pigmented eggs, a divided m. levator mandibulae externus with V 3 passing between the two slips, and usually (for an exception, see Vélez-Rodríguez and Ruiz-Carranza, 2002) the m. adductor longus (Trueb, 1971;Frost et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…nov., and R. rostrata). Lehr et al [8] noticed vitelline-rich eggs (266-286, n = 2) in oviducts of R. chavin and suspected direct development; the eggs had a diameter of 1.8 and 3.1 mm (n = 10), respectively. This is supported by the lack of running or temporary waters where R. chavin was found both at the type locality and in the Cordillera de Carpish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nov. can be distinguished as follows: Rhinella moralesi sp. nov. and R. chavin (Figure 3A,B) share a stout body with relatively short extremities and short digits, large glands on the dorsum and a lateral row of enlarged, elevated glands, males with nuptial pads on the first and second finger and absence of vocal slits [8]. However, R. moralesi sp.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…THE GENUS Rhinella is a group of Neotropical bufonids with 86 species distributed from southern Texas (USA) to southern South America. Among these, the 16 taxa tentatively assigned to the R. veraguensis group (sensu Duellman and Schulte, 1992) are distributed mostly along the Andes from Peru to northwestern Argentina (with the exception of R. chrysophora, endemic to Honduras) and occur across a gradient of 1280-3070 m in altitude (Duellman and Toft, 1979;Duellman and Schulte, 1992;Lehr et al, 2001;Pramuk and Lehr, 2005). However, only five species of this assemblage (R. amboroensis, R. chavin, R. manu, R. nesiotes, and R. veraguensis), have been included in phylogenetic analyses and the group remains paraphyletic in all hypotheses (Pramuk, 2006;Chaparro et al, 2007;van Bocxlaer et al, 2010;Pyron and Wiens, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%