2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
82
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Barham, 2003;Coombe and Aylwin, 2011) and developmental perspectives (Kizos and Vakoufaris, 2011a;Profeta et al, 2010;Rangnekar, 2011), and amongst the many cases analysed, insights have been revealed into the processes of negotiation around Codes of Practice (e.g. Bowen, 2010;Mancini, 2013;Tregear et al, 2007), power relations between actors (Kizos and Vakoufaris, 2011b;Mancini, 2013;Rangnekar, 2011) and the consequences of varying actors' strategies (Bowen, 2010;Bowen and De Master, 2011;Dentoni et al, 2012). However, although the literature to date provides some important clues about the limitations of GIs as tools for economic development and some of the unintended consequences of implementation, we argue it has two key limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barham, 2003;Coombe and Aylwin, 2011) and developmental perspectives (Kizos and Vakoufaris, 2011a;Profeta et al, 2010;Rangnekar, 2011), and amongst the many cases analysed, insights have been revealed into the processes of negotiation around Codes of Practice (e.g. Bowen, 2010;Mancini, 2013;Tregear et al, 2007), power relations between actors (Kizos and Vakoufaris, 2011b;Mancini, 2013;Rangnekar, 2011) and the consequences of varying actors' strategies (Bowen, 2010;Bowen and De Master, 2011;Dentoni et al, 2012). However, although the literature to date provides some important clues about the limitations of GIs as tools for economic development and some of the unintended consequences of implementation, we argue it has two key limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To date, GI research has been based overwhelmingly on cases of the former type, often in countries with political and institutional orientations favourably disposed to GIs, for instance Parma Ham and Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese in Italy (Dentoni et al, 2012), and Roquefort and Comteć heeses in France (Bessie`re, 1998;Bowen and De Master, 2011;Torre, 2006). Whilst such work often confirms that GIs deliver significantly higher margins to producers compared with non-designated alternatives, we argue similar results cannot be assumed for nascent systems -particularly those located in countries with unfavourable political and institutional infrastructure for GIs -because in these systems, GIs act as a potential contributor to reputation building, rather than protector of an existing, high value asset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es cierto que este fenómeno ha generado cierta esquizofrenia por labelizar el mundo rural, lo que nos habla de los peligros de esa progresiva tendencia a musealizar la realidad (Bowen, 2011). Porque más allá de los productos agroalimentarios, los mismos territorios rurales se constituyen actualmente como marcas, bien ligadas a las especificidades ecológicas del territorio (Marca Parque Natural), o a las técnicas tradicionales de elaboración de un determinado producto local (Marca Artesana), o a las excelencias turísticas de las zona (Marca Q de calidad) (López y Aguilar, 2013 dar paso a un modelo de agricultura intensiva para el mercado.…”
Section: Natural Calidad Y Ruralunclassified
“…Such arguments recognise and support "new rurality" conditions within development policy, acknowledging the important contributions that non-farm and off-farm incomes, including those related with rural tourism and the production of value-added products, make to many rural territories (for a review of new rurality see Reference [48]). However, as Bowen and De Master [8] (p. 81) argue, "a key question is how we can protect and preserve traditional products and rural livelihoods without distorting or destroying them, particularly considering the pervasive global reach of the current industrial food system. "…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%