2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Results for an Approximate Method for Calculating Two-Dimensional Furrow Infiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the dispersion component was neglected and only advection was simulated using WinSRFR. The explicit infiltration function of Warrick et al (2007), modified by Bautista et al (2014) and Bautista et al (2016) was used to calculate the flow-depth dependent furrow infiltration. This function has been shown to approximate the solution to the two-dimensional Richards equation reasonably well.…”
Section: Description Of Validation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the dispersion component was neglected and only advection was simulated using WinSRFR. The explicit infiltration function of Warrick et al (2007), modified by Bautista et al (2014) and Bautista et al (2016) was used to calculate the flow-depth dependent furrow infiltration. This function has been shown to approximate the solution to the two-dimensional Richards equation reasonably well.…”
Section: Description Of Validation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable ψ m is estimated by subtracting the hydraulic conductivity from the weighted average of the soil pressure head, and this solution was proposed by Bautista et al [29]. Under ponding water conditions, the cumulative infiltration volume can be written as [28] …”
Section: Ga Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil water characteristic curves and Ks were measured using a soil moisture suction meter (SXY-2, China) and an unsaturated hydraulic conductivity meter (FS-1, China), respectively. The value of ψm was determined using the method of Bautista et al [29] according to the soil water characteristic parameters. Table 1 lists the details of the six laboratory experimental data sets.…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take into account the effect of variable depth of flow along the length of run, the local wetted perimeter option offered by WinSRFR was selected. Under the proposed approach, infiltration could be underestimated since infiltration by absorption is not considered (Fok and Chiang, 1984;Skonard and Martin, 2002;Bautista et al, 2014). For the WinSRFR simulations other option is trapezoidal furrow geometry.…”
Section: Description Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%