We found an imbalance in CXCR3/CCR4 expression on BAL CD4 lymphocytes and reduced CXCL10 BAL levels in patients with IPF, suggesting a pivotal role of these molecules in IPF.

On the basis of the hypothesis that responsiveness of brain metastases (BM) to chemotherapy is primarily determined by the chemosensitivity of primary tumor, rather than the ability of cytotoxic agents to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, we addressed the role of a new combination regimen with Vinorelbine (VNR), Gemcitabine (GEM), and Carboplatin (CBDCA) as a primary treatment modality in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BM. Twenty-two consecutive chemotherapy-naïve patients with documented BM from NSCLC and at least 1 evaluable extracerebral lesion were enrolled in this phase II study. Vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) and GEM (1000 mg/m2) were given on day 1, combined with a fixed daily dose of CBDCA at AUC = 5.0 for three consecutive days. The cycle was repeated every three weeks in an outpatient setting. A total of 116 cycles was given (median 4, range 3-9 per patient). Specific evaluation of BM by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed an overall response rate of 45% in 20 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval, 26-66%), with 3 (15%) complete and 6 (30%) partial remissions; in addition, three minor regressions, five disease stabilizations, and three progressions were found. Patients who responded for the brain also had a response at the extracerebral sites, and a benefit by a remission of symptoms and improvement of performance index was observed in 77% of the whole group. Median time to response was 10 weeks (range 6-12 weeks) and median response duration was 25 weeks (range 12-32 weeks). Median survival time was 33 weeks (range 18-62 + weeks) in the whole group and 48 weeks in responders (range 26-62 + weeks). The adopted schedule was well tolerated and easy to use in the outpatient setting, with good patient compliance. Our results, which are consistent with the study hypothesis, suggest that BM respond to chemotherapy in the same way as systemic disease and primary tumor, and further support the need for reconsideration of the role of chemotherapy in such a clinical setting. Controlled trials comparing chemotherapy with radiotherapy or concomitant sequential chemo-radiotherapy would be appropriate.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), induced sputum and exhaled breath markers (exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate) can each provide biological insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory disorders. Some of their biomarkers are also employed in the clinical management of patients with various respiratory diseases. In the clinical context, however, defining normal values and cut-off points is crucial. The aim of the present review is to investigate to what extent the issue of defining normal values in healthy adults has been pursued for the biomarkers with clinical value.The current authors reviewed data from literature that specifically addressed the issue of normal values from healthy adults for the four methodologies.Most studies have been performed for BAL (n59), sputum (n53) and nitric oxide (n53). There are no published studies for breath condensate, none of whose markers yet has clinical value. In healthy adult nonsmokers the cut-off points (mean+2SD) for biomarkers with clinical value were as follows. BAL: 16.7% lymphocytes, 2.3% neutrophils and 1.9% eosinophils; sputum: 7.7610 6 ?mL -1 total cell count and 2.2% eosinophils; nitric oxide: 20.2 ppb. The methodologies differ concerning the quantity and characteristics of available reference data. Studies focusing on obtaining reference values from healthy individuals are still required, more evidently for the new, noninvasive methodologies.