2020
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New pyrazole‐4‐carbothioamide‐based metal complexes: Synthesis, spectral characterization, computational, antimicrobial, and antitumor investigations

Abstract: A series of 5‐hydroxy‐4‐(N‐substituted carbothioamide) pyrazole derivatives (HL1–HL5) and their iron(III), nickel(II), and copper(II) complexes have been synthesized. Structural elucidations of the isolated ligands and their complexes are basically accomplished by FT‐IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, UV–Vis, ESR, MS, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The analytical data propose the stoichiometries 1:3 (M:L) for Fe(III) and 2:3 for both Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes. The spectral data substantiate the bidentate coordinati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the most active derivatives 3a , 4b , 4d , and 4e revealed a lower energy gap (ΔE) (4.03–4.26 eV) compared with chloroquine (ΔE) = 4.49 eV, and remdesivir (ΔE) = 4.83 eV, i.e., the synthesized derivatives displayed the most stable conformer as well as the most polarizable. Generally, the molecules with lower energy gaps required less excitation energy and could offer electrons to neighboring biological receptors and were predicted to have high biological potency as confirmed by the experimental results [ 34 ]. Moreover, the values of softness S = 0.469–0.495 eV −1 and hardness ɳ = 2.01–2.13 eV displayed superior activity and lower hardness for the most active derivatives 3a , 4b , 4d , and 4e in comparison to chloroquine ( S = 0.446 eV −1 and ɳ = 2.24 eV) and remdesivir ( S = 0.41 eV −1 and ɳ = 2.41 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the most active derivatives 3a , 4b , 4d , and 4e revealed a lower energy gap (ΔE) (4.03–4.26 eV) compared with chloroquine (ΔE) = 4.49 eV, and remdesivir (ΔE) = 4.83 eV, i.e., the synthesized derivatives displayed the most stable conformer as well as the most polarizable. Generally, the molecules with lower energy gaps required less excitation energy and could offer electrons to neighboring biological receptors and were predicted to have high biological potency as confirmed by the experimental results [ 34 ]. Moreover, the values of softness S = 0.469–0.495 eV −1 and hardness ɳ = 2.01–2.13 eV displayed superior activity and lower hardness for the most active derivatives 3a , 4b , 4d , and 4e in comparison to chloroquine ( S = 0.446 eV −1 and ɳ = 2.24 eV) and remdesivir ( S = 0.41 eV −1 and ɳ = 2.41 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Generally, small energy gap ΔE ( E LUMO ‐ E HOMO ) is taken as a good indicator for complexation ability with neighboring central metal ion having empty d‐orbital or biological receptor as well as softness and hence chemical reactivity. [ 19 ] Among the examined ligands, L 4 exhibits the smallest Δ E (3.70 eV) which points to an ease of electron transfer with Ni (II) d‐orbitals owing to its long‐conjugated system of three linked phenyl groups with several donor atoms such as oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur (Figure 6). Also, the higher negative total energy ( E T ) of the complexes ( 2 ) and ( 4 ) compared to their free ligands (Table 3) implies the greater stability of the isolated complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC, μg/ml) was estimated by applying broth microdilution assay as previously depicted in a study conducted by our group. [ 19 ] Ampicillin, gentamycin, and amphotericin B were used as standard references for antibacterial and antifungal activities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All inhibition zone diameter values in mm were assessed in triplicates for the tested samples. Also, MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration in µg/ml) was determined by the serial dilution method as reported 32,33 . The activity of the tested compounds was compared to ketoconazole, gentamycin, and ampicillin as reference controls for antifungal and antibacterial potencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%