2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New psychoactive substances in oral fluid of drivers around a music festival in south-west France in 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the prevalence of NPS including designer stimulants and synthetic cannabinoids was found to be 1.6%. Previous prevalence studies, in contrast, showed higher prevalence rates ranging from 2.2 to 28% 17–24 . However, the prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids determined in Bavaria (2.1%) was similar to or slightly lower than those in Norway (2.2%) 18 and the German federal state Hesse (2.8%) 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the prevalence of NPS including designer stimulants and synthetic cannabinoids was found to be 1.6%. Previous prevalence studies, in contrast, showed higher prevalence rates ranging from 2.2 to 28% 17–24 . However, the prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids determined in Bavaria (2.1%) was similar to or slightly lower than those in Norway (2.2%) 18 and the German federal state Hesse (2.8%) 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Previous prevalence studies, in contrast, showed higher prevalence rates ranging from 2.2 to 28%. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, the prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids determined in Bavaria (2.1%) was similar to or slightly lower than those in Norway (2.2%) 18 and the German federal state Hesse (2.8%). 17 Comparatively higher prevalence rates for stimulant designer drugs (21-28%) and synthetic cannabinoids (15-19%) were found in Hungary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There is very little scienti c literature available about methamnetamine and its toxicity, but it is currently being detected in drug screenings across Europe. Methamnetamine is an uncontrolled substance in most countries (Lajtai, et al, 2020;Richeval, et al, 2019;Rothman, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Stimulant Name Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, α-PVP was temporarily classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a Schedule I compound [22], and since then new derivatives have emerged to replace it. Therefore, with the endeavor to identify and evaluate potential alternatives to α-PVP, as well as to study the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of halogen-substituted analogs of α-PVP, this study is focused on seven novel synthetic cathinones: 3-Fluoro-α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone The use and abuse of para-halogenated α-PVP derivatives has already been reported [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. In fact, 4-Cl-α-PVP was temporary classified as a Schedule I compound in 2019 [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%